Digitalization in banking sector: the role of intrinsic motivation

被引:22
作者
Bastari, Ary [1 ]
Eliyana, Anis [2 ]
Syabarrudin, Agus [3 ]
Arief, Zainal [4 ]
Emur, Alvin Permana [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Negeri Jakarta, Bank Kalsel, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
[2] Univ Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
[3] Univ Lambung Mangkurat, Bank Kalsel, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
[4] Univ 17 Agustus 1945, PT Usaha Mulia Digital Indonesia PT UMDI, North Jakarta, Indonesia
[5] PT Usaha Mulia Digital Indonesia PT UMDI, South Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Intrinsic motivation; Perceived ease of use; Perceived usefulness; Intention to use; Technology acceptance model; Quality job; Broadband access; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; PERCEIVED ENJOYMENT; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; TEST STATISTICS; ADOPTION; EASE; MEDIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05801
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The focus of this work is to test the roles of intrinsic motivation for Bank Kalsel employees regarding the use of applications and websites for task completion and performance evaluation through the TAM approach. A total of 375 staffs throughout Bank Kalsel branch offices were used as respondents in this study. Data obtained from this study were examined using the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) by LISREL 8.8 software. The results show that intrinsic motivation, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness are proven to have a direct effect on the intention to use the web and applications available in the process of digitalization at Bank Kalsel. In addition, the indirect impact of the proposed model is also studied, the findings are perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness found to completely mediate the relationship.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [41] Enjoyment and social influence: predicting mobile payment adoption
    Koenig-Lewis, Nicole
    Marquet, Morgan
    Palmer, Adrian
    Zhao, Anita Lifen
    [J]. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (10) : 537 - 554
  • [42] Kuusisto M., 2017, Int. J. Organ. Theory Behav, V20, P341, DOI DOI 10.1108/IJOTB-20-03-2017-B003
  • [43] Information as a double-edged sword: The role of computer experience and information on applicant reactions towards novel technologies for personnel selection
    Langer, Markus
    Koenig, Cornelius J.
    Fitili, Andromachi
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 81 : 19 - 30
  • [44] The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses
    Lee, Hyun-Hwa
    Fiore, Ann
    Kim, Jihyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 34 (08) : 621 - +
  • [45] Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective
    Lee, Younghwa
    Lee, Jintae
    Hwang, Yujong
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 51 : 418 - 428
  • [46] Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Communit
    Legner, Christine
    Eymann, Torsten
    Hess, Thomas
    Matt, Christian
    Boehmann, Tilo
    Drews, Paul
    Maedche, Alexander
    Urbach, Nils
    Ahlemann, Frederik
    [J]. BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 59 (04): : 301 - 308
  • [47] Service mobile apps: a millennial generation perspective
    Leon, Steven
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2018, 118 (09) : 1837 - 1860
  • [48] Liwei Hsu, 2017, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, V7, P679, DOI 10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.9.953
  • [49] Investigating passengers' intentions to use technology-based self check-in services
    Lu, Jin-Long
    Chou, Hung-Yen
    Ling, Pei-Chuan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2009, 45 (02) : 345 - 356
  • [50] Enabling internet banking adoption An empirical examination with an augmented technology acceptance model (TAM)
    Marakarkandy, Bijith
    Yajnik, Nilay
    Dasgupta, Chandan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 30 (02) : 263 - 294