Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review

被引:70
作者
Rodger, Flora [1 ]
Roditi, Giles [1 ]
Aboumarzouk, Omar M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Univ Hosp, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Stones; Computed tomography; Urolithiasis; Non-contrasted computed tomography scan of the kidney; ureter; and bladder Radiation safety; Renal colic; STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; UROLITHIASIS IMAGE QUALITY; NON-CONTRAST CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR CT; RADIATION; STANDARD; PERFORMANCE; CALCULI; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000488062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT KUB) is the investigation of choice for renal colic; however, radiation exposure can be a concern. Aims: The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of low dose (LD) and ultra-low dose (ULD) CT of the urinary tract for detection of urinary tract stones in patients with renal colic. Methods: A Cochrane style systematic review of the literature from 1995 to 2017 was carried out. Literature search and data extraction were conducted by 2 reviewers. Specificity and sensitivity values were calculated for LD (< 3.5 mean radiation dose [mSv]) and ULD (< 1.9 mSv) CT separately. Results: A total of 12 studies were included following screening. A total of 1,529 patients were included in the review (475 in the LD group and 1,054 in the ULD group). Using standard dose CT KUB as the reference standard, the sensitivity of LD CT KUB ranged from 90 to 98% and specificity from 88 to 100%. The sensitivity of ULD CT KUB ranged from 72 to 99% and the specificity ranged from 86 to 100%. The diagnostic accuracy for LD CT was 94.3% and for ULD CT was 95.5%. Conclusions: LD and ULD CT KUB provide effective methods of identifying urinary tract stones. High diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are maintained despite significant radiation dose reduction in comparison to standard dose CT. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 385
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-pitch low-dose abdominopelvic CT with tin-filtration technique for detecting urinary stones
    Zhang, Gu-Mu-Yang
    Shi, Bing
    Sun, Hao
    Xue, Hua-Dan
    Wang, Yun
    Liang, Ji-Xiang
    Xu, Kai
    Wang, Ming
    Wang, Man
    Xu, Min
    Jin, Zheng-Yu
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (08) : 2127 - 2134
  • [32] A prospective, matched comparison of ultra-low and standard-dose computed tomography for assessment of renal colic
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Williams, Julia
    Khadra, Sam
    Nalavenkata, Sunny
    Kam, Jonathan
    McCombie, Steve P.
    Arianayagam, Mohan
    Canagasingham, Bertram
    Ferguson, Richard
    Khadra, Mohamed
    Varol, Celi
    Winter, Matthew
    Sanaei, Fardin
    Loh, Han
    Thakkar, Yogesh
    Dugdale, Piers
    Ko, Raymond
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 : 27 - 32
  • [33] Ultra-low dose CT for scaphoid fracture detection-a simulational approach to quantify the capability of radiation exposure reduction without diagnostic limitation
    Keller, Gabriel
    Hagen, Florian
    Neubauer, Leoni
    Rachunek, Katarzyna
    Springer, Fabian
    Kraus, Mareen Sarah
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022,
  • [34] Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction
    Fujita, Masayo
    Higaki, Toru
    Awaya, Yoshikazu
    Nakanishi, Toshio
    Nakamura, Yuko
    Tatsugami, Fuminari
    Baba, Yasutaka
    Iida, Makoto
    Awai, Kazuo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04) : 179 - 189
  • [35] Replacing Plain Radiograph with ultra-low dose CT thorax in cystic fibrosis (CF) in the era of CFTR modulation and its impact on cumulative effective dose
    Sheahan, Kevin P.
    O'Mahony, Alexander
    Morrissy, David
    Ibrahim, Hisham
    Crowley, Claire
    Waldron, Michael G.
    Sokol-Randell, Darek
    McMahon, Aisling
    Maher, Michael M.
    O'Connor, Owen J.
    Plant, Barry J.
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2023, 22 (04) : 715 - 721
  • [36] Systematic review of baseline low-dose CT lung cancer screening
    Yau, Gary
    Lock, Michael
    Rodrigues, George
    LUNG CANCER, 2007, 58 (02) : 161 - 170
  • [37] Ultra-low-dose CT for extremities in an acute setting: initial experience with 203 subjects
    Alagic, Zlatan
    Bujila, Robert
    Enocson, Anders
    Srivastava, Subhash
    Koskinen, Seppo K.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (04) : 531 - 539
  • [38] Dual-energy CT kidney stone characterization-can diagnostic accuracy be achieved at low radiation dose?
    Euler, Andre
    Wullschleger, Sara
    Sartoretti, Thomas
    Mueller, Daniel
    Keller, Etienne Xavier
    Lavrek, Dejan
    Donati, Olivio
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (09) : 6238 - 6244
  • [39] Effect of a novel denoising technique on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in low-dose CT in patients with suspected appendicitis
    Kolb, Manuel
    Storz, Corinna
    Kim, Jong Hyo
    Weiss, Jakob
    Afat, Saif
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Othman, Ahmed E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 116 : 198 - 204
  • [40] Ultra-low radiation dose CT angiography of the lower extremity using the iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm
    Qian, W-L.
    Zhou, D. -J.
    Jiang, Y.
    Feng, C.
    Chen, Q.
    Wang, H.
    Zhang, J. -B.
    Xu, J. -M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (11) : 985.e13 - 985.e19