Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges

被引:0
作者
Johannesson, Louise [1 ]
Mavroidis, Petros C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] IFN, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Columbia & Neuchatel Orebro Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] IFN Inst Ind Econ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
World Trade Organization (WTO) judges are proposed by the WTO Secretariat and elected to act as 'judges' if either approved by the parties to a dispute, or, by the WTO Director-General in case no agreement between the parties has been possible. They are typically 'Geneva crowd', that is, they are either current or former delegates representing their country before the WTO. This observation holds for both first as well as second instance WTO judges (e.g., Panellists and members of the Appellate Body). In that, the WTO evidences an attitude strikingly similar to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Whereas the legal regime has been heavily 'legalized', the people called to enforce it remain the same.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 698
页数:14
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Agents, trustees, and international courts: The politics of judicial appointment at the World Trade Organization [J].
Elsig, Manfred ;
Pollack, Mark A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2014, 20 (02) :391-415
[2]  
Horn H, 2011, J WORLD TRADE, V45, P1107
[3]  
Hudec R.E., 1993, ENFORCING INT TRADE
[4]  
Mavroidis Petros C., 2012, THE LAW OF THE WTO
[5]  
Nordstrom Hakan., 2005, Journal of World Trade, V39, P819