Analysis of Compact Fluorescent Lights for Use by Patients with Photosensitive Conditions

被引:28
作者
Klein, Rachel S. [3 ,4 ]
Werth, Victoria P. [3 ,4 ]
Dowdy, John C. [1 ]
Sayre, Robert M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rapid Precis Testing Labs, Cordova, TN USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Div Dermatol, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[3] Philadelphia VA Hosp, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Dermatol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS; ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION; DNA-REPAIR; XERODERMA-PIGMENTOSUM; EXPOSURE; SKIN; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00540.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is hazardous to patients with photosensitive skin disorders, such as lupus erythematosus, xeroderma pigmentosum and skin cancer. As such, these patients are advised to minimize their exposure to UVR. Classically, this is accomplished through careful avoidance of sun exposure and artificial tanning booths. Indoor light bulbs, however, are generally not considered to pose significant UVR hazard. We sought to test this notion by measuring the UV emissions of 19 different compact fluorescent light bulbs. The ability to induce skin damage was assessed with the CIE erythema action spectrum, ANSI S(lambda) generalized UV hazard spectrum and the CIE photocarcinogenesis action spectrum. The results indicate that there is a great deal of variation amongst different bulbs, even within the same class. Although the irradiance of any given bulb is low, the possible daily exposure time is rather lengthy. This results in potential daily UVR doses ranging from 0.1 to 625 mJ cm(-2), including a daily UVB (290-320 nm) dose of 0.01 to 15 mJ cm(-2). Because patients are exposed continually over long time frames, this could lead to significant cumulative damage. It would therefore be prudent for patients to use bulbs with the lowest UV irradiance.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1010
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   RECOVERY OF SKIN FROM A SINGLE SUBERYTHEMAL DOSE OF ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION [J].
ARBABI, L ;
GANGE, RW ;
PARRISH, JA .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1983, 81 (01) :78-82
[2]   The photosensitizing potential of compact fluorescent vs incandescent light bulbs [J].
Chignell, Colin F. ;
Sik, Robert H. ;
Bilski, Piotr J. .
PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 2008, 84 (05) :1291-1293
[3]  
*CIE, 1999, 171661999E CIE
[4]  
*CIE TECHN COMM, 2006, 019E2006 CIE
[5]   EFFECT OF INDOOR LIGHTING ON NORMAL SKIN [J].
COLE, C ;
FORBES, PD ;
DAVIES, RE ;
URBACH, F .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1985, 453 :305-316
[6]  
*CTC, 2002, 009E2002 CIE CTC
[7]  
DEGRUIJL FR, 1983, PHOTOCHEM PHOTOBIOL, V37, P53
[8]  
DIFFEY BL, 1990, SEMIN DERMATOL, V9, P2
[9]   LIGHT SENSITIVITY AND LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS [J].
EPSTEIN, JH ;
TUFFANELLI, DL ;
DUBOIS, EL .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1965, 91 (05) :483-+
[10]  
ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection), 2004, GUID LIM EXP ULTR RA