Intraocular pressure fluctuations: how much do they matter?

被引:40
|
作者
Singh, Kuldev [1 ]
Shrivastava, Anurag [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Dept Ophthalmol, New York, NY USA
[4] Glaucoma Serv, New York, NY USA
关键词
fluctuation; intraocular pressure; mean; progression; variation; VISUAL-FIELD PROGRESSION; INDEPENDENT RISK-FACTOR; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION; OCULAR HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1097/ICU.0b013e328324e6c4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose of review To review the current literature with regard to the importance of IOP fluctuation/variation as independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. Recent findings There are conflicting reports in the literature assessing the relative importance of 'intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation' and 'mean IOF as risk factors for glaucoma progression. There has been a trend toward more studies concluding that IOP fluctuation is an important independent risk factor for such progression but there is considerable variability in the quality of such studies. In particular, assumptions regarding causality have created doubt regarding some conclusions. Recent studies have also suggested that we should not abandon mean IOP as the important predictor of glaucoma progression. It should be noted that several analyses pertaining to this subject have emerged from large prospective randomized clinical trials primarily designed to answer other questions. Summary A review of the literature reveals that there is no conclusive evidence that IOP fluctuation/variation are independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. One should not discount the importance of mean IOP as a predictor of such progression. A major factor limiting all analyses pertaining to this issue is the inability to continuously measure IOP and thus optimally assess mean and variability.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 87
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors of glaucoma progression: Intraocular pressure fluctuations
    Aptel, F.
    Denis, P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2011, 34 (06): : 400 - 402
  • [2] Damping of intraocular pressure fluctuations
    Cringle, Stephen J.
    Yu, Dao-Yi
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 40 (09) : 881 - 887
  • [3] Impact of intraocular pressure fluctuations on progression of normal tension glaucoma
    Hopf, Susanne
    Schwarauschke, Doris
    Schmidtmann, Irene
    Pfeiffer, Norbert
    Hoffmann, Esther Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (10) : 1553 - 1559
  • [4] How much does cataract surgery contribute to intraocular pressure lowering?
    Sabharwal, Jasdeep
    Garg, Anupam K.
    Ramulu, Pradeep Y.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 35 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [5] New perspectives on target intraocular pressure
    Clement, Colin I.
    Bhartiya, Shibal
    Shaarawy, Tarek
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 59 (06) : 615 - 626
  • [6] Comparing the measurement of diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure in the same day versus over different days in glaucoma
    Magacho, Leopoldo
    Toscano, Daniela A.
    Freire, Gislene
    Shetty, Rajesh K.
    Avila, Marcos P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 20 (03) : 542 - 545
  • [7] What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable?
    Hamard, P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2010, 33 (04): : 279 - 284
  • [8] Diurnal and Nocturnal Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations after Trabeculectomy
    Klink, Thomas
    Praetorius, Stefanie
    Leippi, Swetlana
    Klink, Janine
    Grehn, Franz J.
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2012, 227 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [9] Diurnal Fluctuations of Intraocular Pressure, Blood Pressure, and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Glaucoma Patients
    Spaniol, K.
    Schoeppner, M.
    Eter, N.
    Prokosch-Willing, V.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (06) : 773 - 778
  • [10] Fluctuations of the Intraocular Pressure in One Eye Influence the Intraocular Pressure in the Fellow Eye
    Voykov, Bogomil
    Blumenstock, Gunnar
    Ziemssen, Focke
    Bartz-Schmidt, Karl Ulrich
    Schultheiss, Maximillian
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (02) : 211 - 216