Relationship between residual feed intake and digestibility for lactating Holstein cows fed high and low starch diets

被引:53
作者
Potts, S. B. [1 ]
Boerman, J. P. [1 ]
Lock, A. L. [1 ]
Allen, M. S. [1 ]
VandeHaar, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
digestibility depression; feed efficiency; dry matter intake; BEEF-CATTLE; DAIRY-COWS; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; DIVERGENT SELECTION; MILK-PRODUCTION; EFFICIENCY; DIGESTION; FIBER; PERFORMANCE; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2016-11079
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
We determined if differences in digestibility among cows explained variation in residual feed intake (RFI) in 4 crossover design experiments. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 109; 120 +/- 30 d in milk; mean +/- SD) were fed diets high (HS) or low (LS) in starch. The HS diets were 30% (+/- 1.8%) starch and 27% (+/- 1.2%) neutral detergent fiber (NDF); LS diets were 14% (+/- 2.2%) starch and 40% (+/- 5.3%) NDF. Each experiment consisted of two 28-d treatment periods, with apparent total-tract digestibility measured using indigestible NDF as an internal marker during the last 5 d of each period. Individual cow dry matter (DM) intake and milk yield were recorded daily, body weight was measured 3 to 5 times per week, and milk components were analyzed 2 d/wk. Individual DM intake was regressed on milk energy output, metabolic body weight, body energy gain, and fixed effects of parity, experiment, cohort (a group of cows that received treatments in the same sequence) nested within experiment, and diet nested within cohort and experiment, with the residual being RFI. High RFI cows ate more than expected and were deemed less efficient. Residual feed intake correlated negatively with digestibility of starch for both HS (r = -0.31) and LS (r = -0.23) diets, and with digestibilities of DM (r = -0.30) and NDF (r = -0.23) for LS diets but was not correlated with DM or NDF digestibility for HS diets. For each cohort within an experiment, cows were classified as high RFI (HRFI; >0.5 SD), medium RFI (MRFI; +/- 0.5 SD), and low RFI (LRFI; <-0.5 SD). Digestibility of DM was similar (similar to 66%) among HRFI and LRFI for HS diets but greater for LRFI when fed LS diets (64 vs. 62%). For LS diets, digestibility of DM could account for up to 31% of the differences among HRFI and LRFI for apparent diet energy density, as determined from individual cow performance, indicating that digestibility explains some of the between-animal differences for the ability to convert gross energy into net energy. Some of the differences in digestibility between HRFI and LRFI were expected because cows with high RFI eat at a greater multiple of maintenance, and greater intake is associated with increased passage rate and digestibility depression. Based on these data, we conclude that a cow's digestive ability explains none of the variation in RFI for cows eating high starch diets but 9 to 31% of the variation in RFI when cows are fed low starch diets. Perhaps differences in other metabolic processes, such as tissue turnover, heat production, or others related to maintenance, can account for more variation in RFI than digestibility.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 278
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Aspergillus oryzae on ruminal fermentation, feed intake and dry matter digestibility in cows fed forage-based diets
    Sosa, Areadne
    Marrero, Yoandra
    Gonzalez, Niurca
    Albelo, Nereyda
    Moreira, Onidia B.
    Cairo, Juan
    Galindo, Juana
    ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1519 - 1524
  • [22] The relationship between infrared thermography and residual feed intake in cows
    Schaefer, A. L.
    Basarab, J.
    Scott, S.
    Colyn, J.
    McCartney, D.
    McKinnon, J.
    Okine, E.
    Tong, A. K. W.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2005, 88 : 263 - 263
  • [23] The relationship between infrared thermography and residual feed intake in cows
    Schaefer, A. L.
    Basarab, J.
    Scott, S.
    Colyn, J.
    McCartney, D.
    McKinnon, J.
    Okine, E.
    Tong, A. K. W.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 : 263 - 263
  • [24] Site of infusion of a commercially available direct-fed microbial on performance and digestibility in lactating Holstein cows
    Thompson, K. S.
    McKeith, A. G.
    Krehbiel, C. R.
    APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 39 (02): : 44 - 55
  • [25] Effect of Feed Additives on Digestibility and Milk Yield of Holstein Cows Fed Wet Brewer Grains
    Aguilera-Soto, J. I.
    Ramirez, R. G.
    Arechiga, C. F.
    Mendez-Llorente, F.
    Lopez-Carlos, M. A.
    Pina-Flores, J. A.
    Medina-Flores, C. A.
    Rodriguez-Frausto, H.
    Rodriguez-Tenorio, D.
    Gutierrez-Banuelos, H.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [26] Identification of biological traits associated with differences in residual energy intake among lactating Holstein cows
    Fischer, A.
    Delagarde, R.
    Faverdin, P.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (05) : 4193 - 4211
  • [27] Analysis of feed intake and energy balance of high-yielding first lactating Holstein cows with fixed and random regression models
    Huettmann, H.
    Stamer, E.
    Junge, W.
    Thaller, G.
    Kalm, E.
    Animal, 2009, 3 (02) : 181 - 188
  • [28] Relationship between residual feed intake and digestive traits of fattening bulls fed grass silage- or maize silage-based diets
    Coppa, M.
    Martin, C.
    Bes, A.
    Ragionieri, L.
    Ravanetti, F.
    Lund, P.
    Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G.
    Noziere, P.
    ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (12)
  • [29] Intake and apparent digestibility of dry matter, milk production, and composition of cows fed with diets containing oilseed cakes: A meta-analysis
    de Lima Santos, Girlene Cordeiro
    Gonzaga Neto, Severino
    Bezerra, Leilson Rocha
    de Medeiros, Ariosvaldo Nunes
    Ramos de Carvalho, Francisco Fernando
    de Oliveira, Juliana Silva
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2022, 93 (01)
  • [30] Effect of cinnamaldehyde on feed intake, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility, in lactating dairy cows
    Chapman, Colleen E.
    Ort, Shona B.
    Aragona, Kayla M.
    Cabral, Rosemarie G.
    Erickson, Peter S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 (04) : 1819 - 1827