A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education

被引:47
作者
Kua, Joanne [1 ]
Lim, Wee-Shiong [1 ]
Teo, Winnie [2 ]
Edwards, Roger A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Inst Geriatr & Act Aging, Dept Geriatr Med, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433, Singapore
[2] Natl Healthcare Grp, Grp Educ, Singapore, Singapore
[3] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Ctr Interprofess Studies & Innovat, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Adaptive expertise; scoping review; medical education; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2020.1851020
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Adaptive expertise encompasses efficiency and innovation; however little is known about the state of research of adaptive expertise in medical education. Our scoping review summarizes existing evidence in the conceptual frameworks, development, and measurement for adaptive expertise. We searched Pubmed, MEDLINE, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycINFO for original research articles published from 1986 onwards in English. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, no quantitative syntheses were conducted and the articles were summarized qualitatively. Of the 48 articles that met inclusion criteria, 19 examined conceptual frameworks, 24 explored interventions supporting development and 5 examined measurement. Conceptual frameworks are consistent within and beyond health professions education. Factors influencing development include: predisposing factors such as knowledge (ability to integrate knowledge and innovate), beliefs and attitudes (high motivation and humility), enabling factors such as skills (people skills, implementing reflection and scholarly activities), resources such as curricular enablers (providing variability of cases, allowing flexibility to generate solutions, critical appraisal of textbooks) and reinforcing factors such as mentor-guided feedback and constant curricular review. Two validated measurement tools exist for adaptive expertise. Substantial research opportunities exist in studying interventions involving the development of adaptive expertise. Notable gaps exist in the development and validation of measurement tools.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 355
页数:9
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Prospective teachers development of adaptive expertise [J].
Anthony, Glenda ;
Hunter, Jodie ;
Hunter, Roberta .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2015, 49 :108-117
[2]  
Arksey H., 2005, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[3]   Solution strategies and adaptivity in multidigit division in a choice/no-choice experiment: Student and instructional factors [J].
Auer, Marije F. Fagginger ;
Hickendorff, Marian ;
van Putten, Cornelis M. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2016, 41 :52-59
[4]   On the Importance of Mental Time Frames: A Case for the Need of Empirical Methods to Investigate Adaptive Expertise [J].
Axelsson, Anton ;
Jansson, Anders A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2018, 7 (01) :51-59
[5]  
Barnett S. M., 2002, Thinking & Reasoning, V8, P237, DOI 10.1080/13546780244000088
[6]   Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability [J].
Bell, Bradford S. ;
Kozlowski, Steve W. J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (02) :296-316
[7]  
Benner P., 1984, From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice
[8]   Exploring Teacher Adaptive Expertise in the Context of Elementary School Science Reforms [J].
Bowers, Nicole ;
Merritt, Eileen ;
Rimm-Kaufman, Sara .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 31 (01) :34-55
[9]  
Bransford J, 2007, J ENG EDUC, V96, P1
[10]   How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise [J].
Carbonell, Kateriha Bohle ;
Stalmeijer, Renee E. ;
Konings, Karen D. ;
Seger, Mien ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroeri J. G. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2014, 12 :14-29