Modelling soil cation exchange capacity in different land-use systems using artificial neural networks and multiple regression analysis

被引:13
作者
Mishra, Gaurav [1 ]
Das, Juri [1 ]
Sulieman, Magboul [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rain Forest Res Inst, Jorhat 785001, Assam, India
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Soil Sci Dept, POB 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Khartoum, Fac Agr, Dept Soil & Environm Sci, Khartoum 13314, Shambat, Sudan
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2019年 / 116卷 / 12期
关键词
Artificial neural networks; cation exchange capacity; multiple regression; land uses; ORGANIC-CARBON; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTIONS; QUALITY; PREDICTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v116/i12/2020-2027
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cation exchange capacity (CEC), as an important indicator of soil quality, represents the ability of the soil to hold positively charged ions. In this study, CEC was successfully predicted using different statistical methods, including artificial neural networks (ANNs) involving multi-layer perceptron (MLP), radial basis function (RBF), multiple linear regression (MLR) and nonlinear regression (NLR). About 293 soil samples were collected from North East India, which are under three land uses (shifting agriculture (jhum), forest and cash crops). Also, 70% of the samples (205 samples) was selected as the calibration set and the remaining 30% (88 samples) used as the prediction set. Soil pH, texture, bulk density (BD) and organic carbon (OC) were used as predictor variables to estimate CEC. The CEC-pedotransfer function (CEC-PTF) performance was evaluated with the coefficient of determination (R-2), root mean square error (RMSE) and standard error for the estimate (SEE) between the observed and predicted values. The results indicated that the nonlinear model (R-2 = 0.91 and SEE = 1.82 for training) for cash-crop system, and RBF (R-2 = 0.91 and SEE = 3.83 for training) for jhum system were the best models to estimate CEC. In contrast, RBF (R-2 = 0.67 and SEE = 14.87 for training) for forest system was the worst model to estimate CEC. The results confirm that clay and OC were the most influential variables to predict CEC in the cash-crop system, whereas BD and OC were more suitable for jhum system. Although the ANNs provided suitable predictions of the entire dataset, NLR gave a formula to estimate soil CEC using commonly tested soil properties. Thus, NLR provided a reasonable estimate of CEC for most soils analysed.
引用
收藏
页码:2020 / 2027
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Soil physical quality changes under different management systems after 10 years in the Argentine humid pampa
    Costa, J. L.
    Aparicio, V.
    Cerda, A.
    [J]. SOLID EARTH, 2015, 6 (01) : 361 - 371
  • [12] FSI, 2017, IND STAT FOR REP, P363
  • [13] Hadi Memarian Hadi Memarian, 2012, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V4, P870, DOI 10.4236/jwarp.2012.410102
  • [14] Cation exchange processes in structured soils at various hydraulic properties
    Hartmann, A
    Grasle, W
    Horn, R
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1998, 47 (1-2) : 67 - 72
  • [15] KARMAKAR R.M., 1999, INDIAN SOC SOIL SCI, V47, P761
  • [16] The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Keesstra, Saskia D.
    Bouma, Johan
    Wallinga, Jakob
    Tittonell, Pablo
    Smith, Pete
    Cerda, Artemi
    Montanarella, Luca
    Quinton, John N.
    Pachepsky, Yakov
    van der Putten, Wim H.
    Bardgett, Richard D.
    Moolenaar, Simon
    Mol, Gerben
    Jansen, Boris
    Fresco, Louise O.
    [J]. SOIL, 2016, 2 (02) : 111 - 128
  • [17] Modeling soil cation exchange capacity in multiple countries
    Khaledian, Yones
    Brevik, Eric C.
    Pereira, Paulo
    Cerda, Artemi
    Fattah, Mohammed A.
    Tazikeh, Hossein
    [J]. CATENA, 2017, 158 : 194 - 200
  • [18] The Influence of Organic Carbon and pH on Heavy Metals, Potassium, and Magnesium Levels in Lithuanian Podzols
    Khaledian, Yones
    Pereira, Paulo
    Brevik, Eric C.
    Pundyte, Neringa
    Paliulis, Dainius
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (01) : 345 - 354
  • [19] Assessment and Monitoring of Soil Degradation during Land Use Change Using Multivariate Analysis
    Khaledian, Yones
    Kiani, Farshad
    Ebrahimi, Soheila
    Brevik, Eric C.
    Aitkenhead-Peterson, Jacqueline
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (01) : 128 - 141
  • [20] Klute C.T., 1986, AGRONOMY, V9, P687, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSAB00KSER5.1.2ED.C28