Modelin-g credit risk with a Tobit model of days past due

被引:9
作者
Brezigar-Masten, Arjana [1 ,4 ]
Masten, Igor [2 ,5 ]
Volk, Matjaz [3 ]
机构
[1] Bank Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Econ & Business, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] European Cent Bank, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Univ Primorska, Fac Math Nat Sciencies & Informat Technol, Koper, Slovenia
[5] EconLab, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Tobit; Days past due; Credit risk; Probability of default; Rating; IFRS9; PANEL-DATA MODELS; INITIAL CONDITIONS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105984
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper we propose a novel credit risk modelling approach where number of days past due is modeled instead of a binary indicator of default. In line with regulatory requirements, the number of days overdue on loan repayments are transformed to a binary variable by applying 90-days past due threshold, and use it as the dependent variable in default probability models. However, potentially useful information is lost with this transformation. Lower levels of days past due are expected to be good predictors of future incidence of default. We show that a dynamic Tobit model, where number of days overdue is used as a censored continuous dependent variable, significantly outperforms models based on binary indicators of default. It correctly identifies more than 70% of defaulters and issues less than 1% of false alarms. Its superiority is confirmed also by more accurate rating classification, higher rating stability over the business cycle and more timely identification of defaulted borrowers. The implications for banks are clear. By modelling number of days past due they can significantly improve risk identification and reduce procyclicality of IRB capital requirements. Moreover, we show how modelling of days past due can be used also for stage allocation for the purposes of IFRS9 reporting. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Finite-sample comparison of alternative methods for estimating dynamic panel data models [J].
Akay, Alpaslan .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2012, 27 (07) :1189-1204
[2]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[3]   FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF DYNAMIC-MODELS USING PANEL DATA [J].
ANDERSON, TW ;
HSIAO, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1982, 18 (01) :47-82
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INT CONV CAP MEAS CA
[6]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[7]   Binary choice panel data models with predetermined variables [J].
Arellano, M ;
Carrasco, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 115 (01) :125-157
[8]   Are hazard models superior to traditional bankruptcy prediction approaches? A comprehensive test [J].
Bauer, Julian ;
Agarwal, Vineet .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 40 :432-442
[9]  
BCBS, 2001, INT RAT BAS APPR SUP
[10]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143