Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour

被引:115
作者
Medeiros, Lidia R. F. [1 ]
Rosa, Daniela D. [2 ]
Bozzetti, Mary C. [1 ]
Fachel, Jandyra M. G. [3 ]
Furness, Sue [4 ]
Garry, Ray [5 ,6 ]
Rosa, Maria I. N. E. S. [7 ]
Stein, Airton T. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Med, BR-90880480 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Hosp Femina, Grp Hosp Conceicao, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Matemat, Dept Estat, BR-90880480 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Auckland, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[5] Univ Tesside, Middlesbrough, Guisborough, England
[6] S Cleveland Hosp, Middlesbrough, Guisborough, England
[7] Univ Extremadura Sul Catarinense, Sch Med, Criciuma, Brazil
[8] Fundacao Fac Fed Ciencias Med Porto Algre, Dept Epidemiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 02期
关键词
REPRODUCTIVE-AGE WOMEN; ADNEXAL MASSES; DERMOID CYSTS; SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; EXCISION; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD004751.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Over the last 10 years laparoscopy and minilaparotomy have become increasingly common approaches for the surgical removal of benign ovarian tumours. However, in the event that a tumour is found to be malignant, laparotomy is the appropriate procedure. Careful preoperative assessment including transvaginal ultrasound with morphological scoring, colour doppler assessment of vascular quality, and serum cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) level is desirable. Objectives To determine the benefits, harms, and cost of laparoscopy or minilaparotomy compared with laparotomy in women with benign ovarian tumours. Search strategy We searched electronic databases, trial registers, and reference lists of published trial reports. Reference lists from trials and review articles were searched. Selection criteria All randomised controlled trials comparing either laparoscopy or minilaparotomy with laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours. Data collection and analysis Eight review authors independently assessed the eligibility and quality of each study and extracted the data. Main results The results of nine randomised controlled trials (N = 482 women) showed that laparoscopic surgery was associated with fewer adverse events of surgery (surgical injury or postoperative complications including fever or infection) (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), less postoperative pain (VAS score WMD -2.4, 95% CI -2.7 to -2.0), greater likelihood of being pain free after two days (OR 7.42, 95% CI 4.86 to 11.33), and fewer days in hospital (WMD -2.88, 95% CI -3.1 to -2.7) than with laparotomy. In one study that reported costs, laparoscopy was associated with a significant reduction in costs compared to laparotomy (WMD - USD 1045, 95% CI - 1348 to - 742) in 1993. Very high levels of heterogeneity made it inappropriate to pool data on duration of surgery. Three RCTs compared laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy and found that laparoscopy was associated with reduced odds of any adverse event (surgical injury or postoperative complications) (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0 to 0.8) and lower VAS scores for pain (WMD -1.0, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.45). Duration of hospital stay ranged between 1 and 2.2 days, with substantial heterogeneity. Authors' conclusions In women undergoing surgery for benign ovarian tumours, laparoscopy was associated with a reduction in fever, urinary tract infection, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, number of days in hospital, and total cost. These findings should be interpreted with caution since only a small number of studies were identified. These included a total of only 769 women and not all of the important outcomes were reported in each study.
引用
收藏
页数:130
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] ALBINI SM, 1994, J AM ASSOC GYN LAP, V1, P219
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1909, MEDDELANDE FRAN LUND
  • [3] Laparoscopy or laparotomy in the management of benign adnexal cysts in premenopausal women
    Badawy, AM
    Allakkany, NS
    El-Gohary, AS
    Youssef, HM
    Nazar, M
    [J]. GYNAECOLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 11 (05) : 285 - 291
  • [4] OVARIAN-CANCER - DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
    BARBER, HRK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 150 (08) : 910 - 916
  • [5] BARNES BA, 1982, SURG CLIN N AM, V62, P737
  • [6] BASSIL S, 1994, ATLAS LASER OPERATIV, P165
  • [7] BATEMAN BG, 1994, FERTIL STERIL, V62, P690
  • [8] OVARIAN MASSES - CAN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT LESIONS BE DIFFERENTIATED WITH COLOR AND PULSED DOPPLER US
    BROWN, DL
    FRATES, MC
    LAING, FC
    DISALVO, DN
    DOUBILET, PM
    BENSON, CB
    WAITZKIN, ED
    MUTO, MG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 333 - 336
  • [9] Laparoscopy in patients over 60 years old:: A prospective, randomized evaluation of laparoscopic versus open adnexectomy
    Buchweitz, O
    Matthias, S
    Müller-Steinhardt, M
    Malik, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (04) : 1364 - 1368
  • [10] Financial impact in the Italian Health Service of laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts
    Bulletti, C
    Seracchioli, R
    Polli, V
    Albonetti, A
    Rossi, S
    Barbieri, L
    Callegaro, A
    Flamigni, C
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1996, 11 (02) : 287 - 290