ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming

被引:42
作者
Friedrich, CK [1 ]
Kotz, SA [1 ]
Friederici, AD [1 ]
Gunter, TC [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Cognit Neurosci, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1162/089892904323057281
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Behavioral evidence suggests that spoken word recognition involves the temporary activation of multiple entries in a listener's mental lexicon. This phenomenon can be demonstrated in cross-modal word fragment priming (CMWP). In CMWP, an auditory word fragment ( prime) is immediately followed by a visual word or pseudoword ( target). Experiment 1 investigated ERPs for targets presented in this paradigm. Half of the targets were congruent with the prime ( e. g., in the prime target pair: AM-AMBOSS [anvil]), half were not (e.g., AM-PENSUM [pensum]). Lexical entries of the congruent targets should receive activation from the prime. Thus, lexical identification of these targets should be facilitated. An ERP effect named P350, two frontal negative ERP deflections, and the N400 were sensitive to prime-target congruency. In Experiment 2, the relation of the formerly observed ERP effects to processes in a modality-independent mental lexicon was investigated by presenting primes visually. Only the P350 effect could be replicated across different fragment lengths. Therefore, the P350 is discussed as a correlate of lexical identification in a modality-independent mental lexicon.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 552
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[2]  
Coltheart M., 1977, ATTENTION PERFORM, P535, DOI DOI 10.1006/BRLN.2001.2475
[3]   Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition [J].
Connine, CM ;
Titone, D ;
Deelman, T ;
Blasko, D .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 37 (04) :463-480
[4]   Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners [J].
Cooper, N ;
Cutler, A ;
Wales, R .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2002, 45 :207-228
[5]   Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch [J].
Cutler, A ;
Van Donselaar, W .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2001, 44 :171-195
[6]  
Cutler A., 1999, NEUROCOGNITION LANGU, P123, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198507932.003.0005
[7]   A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming [J].
Doyle, MC ;
Rugg, MD ;
Wells, T .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 33 (02) :132-147
[8]   Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words [J].
Dumay, N ;
Benraïss, A ;
Barriol, B ;
Colin, C ;
Radeau, M ;
Besson, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (01) :121-143
[9]  
FRAUENFELDER UH, 1999, LANGUAGE COMPREHENSI, P1
[10]   An electrophysiological response to different pitch contours in words [J].
Friedrich, CK ;
Alter, K ;
Kotz, SA .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (15) :3189-3191