Characterization of Air and Ground Temperature Relationships within the CMIP5 Historical and Future Climate Simulations

被引:30
|
作者
Garcia-Garcia, Almudena [1 ,2 ]
Cuesta-Valero, Francisco Jose [1 ,2 ]
Beltrami, Hugo [1 ,3 ]
Smerdon, Jason E. [4 ]
机构
[1] St Francis Xavier Univ, Climate & Atmospher Sci Inst, Antigonish, NS, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Environm Sci Program, St John, NF, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec, Ctr ESCER Etud & Simulat Climate Echelle Reg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM; ATMOSPHERE COUPLING EXPERIMENT; SOIL-MOISTURE; PART I; WARM-SEASON; SNOW COVER; GREAT-PLAINS; ETA-MODEL; LAND; PRECIPITATION;
D O I
10.1029/2018JD030117
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The relationships between air and ground surface temperatures across North America are examined in the historical and future projection simulations from 32 general circulation models (GCMs) included in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The difference between surface air (2 m) and ground surface (10 cm) temperatures is affected by simulated snow cover, vegetation cover, and precipitation by means of changes in soil moisture and soil properties. In winter, the differences between air and ground surface temperatures, for all CMIP5 simulations, are related to the insulating effect of snow cover and soil freezing phenomena. In summer, large leaf area index and large precipitation rates correspond to smaller differences between air and ground temperatures for the majority of simulations, likely due to induced changes in latent and sensible heat fluxes at the ground surface. Our results show that the representation of air-ground coupling, analyzed using the difference between ground and air surface temperatures as metric, differs from observations, the North American Regional Reanalysis product and among the CMIP5 GCM simulations, by amounts that depend on the employed land surface model. The large variability among GCMs and the marked dependence of the results on the choice of the land surface model illustrate the need for improving the representation of processes controlling the coupling of the lower atmosphere and the land surface in GCMs as a mean of reducing the variability in their representation of weather and climate phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:3903 / 3929
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How well do CMIP5 climate simulations replicate historical trends and patterns of meteorological droughts?
    Nasrollahi, Nasrin
    AghaKouchak, Amir
    Cheng, Linyin
    Damberg, Lisa
    Phillips, Thomas J.
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Hsu, Kuolin
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (04) : 2847 - 2864
  • [42] Assessment of CMIP5 historical simulations of rainfall over Southeast Asia
    Raghavan, Srivatsan V.
    Liu, Jiandong
    Ngoc Son Nguyen
    Minh Tue Vu
    Liong, Shie-Yui
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2018, 132 (3-4) : 989 - 1002
  • [43] Assessment of CMIP5 historical simulations of rainfall over Southeast Asia
    Srivatsan V Raghavan
    Jiandong Liu
    Ngoc Son Nguyen
    Minh Tue Vu
    Shie-Yui Liong
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2018, 132 : 989 - 1002
  • [44] Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models over MENA Region Using Historical Simulations and Future Projections
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Nashwan, Mohamed Salem
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [45] Evaluation of ACCESS climate model ocean diagnostics in CMIP5 simulations
    Marsland, S. J.
    Bi, D.
    Uotila, P.
    Fiedler, R.
    Griffies, S. M.
    Lorbacher, K.
    O'Farrell, S.
    Sullivan, A.
    Uhe, P.
    Zhou, X.
    Hirst, A. C.
    AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2013, 63 (01): : 101 - 119
  • [46] Evaluation of CMIP5 palaeo-simulations to improve climate projections
    Harrison S.P.
    Bartlein P.J.
    Izumi K.
    Li G.
    Annan J.
    Hargreaves J.
    Braconnot P.
    Kageyama M.
    Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 (8) : 735 - 743
  • [47] Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models
    Forster, Piers M.
    Andrews, Timothy
    Good, Peter
    Gregory, Jonathan M.
    Jackson, Lawrence S.
    Zelinka, Mark
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (03) : 1139 - 1150
  • [48] Evaluation of CMIP5 palaeo-simulations to improve climate projections
    Harrison, S. P.
    Bartlein, P. J.
    Izumi, K.
    Li, G.
    Annan, J.
    Hargreaves, J.
    Braconnot, P.
    Kageyama, M.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (08) : 735 - 743
  • [49] Assessment of Precipitation Simulations in Central Asia by CMIP5 Climate Models
    Ta, Zhijie
    Yu, Yang
    Sun, Lingxiao
    Chen, Xi
    Mu, Guijin
    Yu, Ruide
    WATER, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [50] Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models
    Christensen, Jens H.
    Boberg, Fredrik
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39