The Symbol Digit Modalities Test as sentinel test for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

被引:132
作者
Van Schependom, J. [1 ,2 ]
D'hooghe, M. B. [1 ,3 ]
Cleynhens, K. [3 ]
D'hooge, M. [3 ]
Haelewyck, M. C. [2 ]
De Keyser, J. [1 ,4 ]
Nagels, G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Ctr Neurosci, Dept Neurol, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Fac Psychol & Sci Educ, Mons, Belgium
[3] Natl MS Ctr Melsbroek, Melsbroek, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
assessment of cognitive disorders; cognitive impairment; multiple sclerosis; sentinel test; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRIEF REPEATABLE BATTERY; DYSFUNCTION; DEFICIT; SPEED; PERFORMANCE; MEMORY; PASAT;
D O I
10.1111/ene.12463
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose: Cognitive impairment (CI) is found in about half of the multiple sclerosis (MS) population and is an important contributor to employment status and social functioning. CI is encountered in all disease stages and correlates only moderately with disease duration or Expanded Disability Status Scale scores. Most present neuropsychological test batteries are time-demanding and expensive. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) has been suggested as a screening tool for CI in MS. In this paper, we aim to assess the performance of the SDMT in predicting the outcome of an extensive battery. Methods: Neuropsychological test results from 359 patients were assessed in a multidisciplinary MS center (National MS Center Melsbroek, Belgium). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the performance of the SDMT in predicting the general cognitive outcome of the extensive Neuropsychological Screening Battery for MS (NSBMS) could be assessed. The performance of the SDMT was assessed for different levels of CI and compared with other cognitive tests. Finally, useful covariates were included in a logistic regression model. Results: At a specificity of 0.60 a high sensitivity (0.91) was obtained indicating the potential of the SDMT as a sentinel test for CI in MS. The SDMT outperformed the individual tests included in the NSBMS, used as benchmark. As the logistic regression model did not result in a relevant improvement, it is concluded that most clinical variables influence both the SDMT and the NSBMS in a similar way. Excluding patients with possible practice effects, an optimal cutoff of 40 was found for the SDMT. Conclusion: As the SDMT is an easy, low-cost and fast test, this result may help to detect CI in everyday clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and equivalence of alternate forms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: implications for multiple sclerosis clinical trials
    Benedict, Ralph H. B.
    Smerbeck, Audrey
    Parikh, Rajavi
    Rodgers, Jonathan
    Cadavid, Diego
    Erlanger, David
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (09) : 1320 - 1325
  • [22] The Symbol-Digit Modalities Test in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Evidence from Parkinson's Disease Patients
    Pascoe, Maddie
    Alamri, Yassar
    Dalrymple-Alford, John
    Anderson, Tim
    MacAskill, Michael
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 79 (3-4) : 206 - 210
  • [23] Anatomical and functional differences between the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test
    Forn, Cristina
    Belenguer, Antonio
    Belloch, Vicente
    Sanjuan, Ana
    Antonia Parcet, M.
    Avila, Cesar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [24] Remote administration of the symbol digit modalities test to individuals with multiple sclerosis is reliable: A short report
    Eilam-Stock, Tehila
    Shaw, Michael T.
    Sherman, Kathleen
    Krupp, Lauren B.
    Charvet, Leigh E.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL-EXPERIMENTAL TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [25] Interpreting change on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis using the reliable change methodology
    Weinstock, Zachary
    Morrow, Sarah
    Conway, Devon
    Fuchs, Tom
    Wojcik, Curtis
    Unverdi, Mahmut
    Zivadinov, Robert
    Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
    Iverson, Grant L.
    Dwyer, Michael
    Benedict, Ralph H. B.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (07) : 1101 - 1111
  • [26] Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis
    Jongen, P. J.
    Ter Horst, A. T.
    Brands, A. M.
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2012, 103 (02) : 73 - 96
  • [27] The adapted symbol digit modalities test: Examining the impact of response modality
    Costa, Silvana L.
    Ashkenazi, Simone Schwizer
    Strober, Lauren B.
    Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.
    Vakil, Eli
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2021, 49 (02) : 215 - 220
  • [28] Incidental Learning During Rapid Information Processing on the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test
    Denney, Douglas R.
    Hughes, Abbey J.
    Elliott, Jacquelyn K.
    Roth, Alexandra K.
    Lynch, Sharon G.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 30 (04) : 322 - 328
  • [29] In-person and remote administrations of the symbol digit modalities test are interchangeable among persons with multiple sclerosis
    Levy, Sarah
    Dvorak, Emily M.
    Graney, Robin
    Staker, Erin
    Sumowski, James F.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2023, 71
  • [30] The Face-Symbol Test and the Symbol-Digit Test are not reliable surrogates for the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test in multiple sclerosis
    Williams, J.
    O'Rourke, K.
    Hutchinson, M.
    Tubridy, N.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (05) : 599 - 604