The Symbol Digit Modalities Test as sentinel test for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

被引:132
|
作者
Van Schependom, J. [1 ,2 ]
D'hooghe, M. B. [1 ,3 ]
Cleynhens, K. [3 ]
D'hooge, M. [3 ]
Haelewyck, M. C. [2 ]
De Keyser, J. [1 ,4 ]
Nagels, G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Ctr Neurosci, Dept Neurol, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Fac Psychol & Sci Educ, Mons, Belgium
[3] Natl MS Ctr Melsbroek, Melsbroek, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
assessment of cognitive disorders; cognitive impairment; multiple sclerosis; sentinel test; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRIEF REPEATABLE BATTERY; DYSFUNCTION; DEFICIT; SPEED; PERFORMANCE; MEMORY; PASAT;
D O I
10.1111/ene.12463
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose: Cognitive impairment (CI) is found in about half of the multiple sclerosis (MS) population and is an important contributor to employment status and social functioning. CI is encountered in all disease stages and correlates only moderately with disease duration or Expanded Disability Status Scale scores. Most present neuropsychological test batteries are time-demanding and expensive. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) has been suggested as a screening tool for CI in MS. In this paper, we aim to assess the performance of the SDMT in predicting the outcome of an extensive battery. Methods: Neuropsychological test results from 359 patients were assessed in a multidisciplinary MS center (National MS Center Melsbroek, Belgium). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the performance of the SDMT in predicting the general cognitive outcome of the extensive Neuropsychological Screening Battery for MS (NSBMS) could be assessed. The performance of the SDMT was assessed for different levels of CI and compared with other cognitive tests. Finally, useful covariates were included in a logistic regression model. Results: At a specificity of 0.60 a high sensitivity (0.91) was obtained indicating the potential of the SDMT as a sentinel test for CI in MS. The SDMT outperformed the individual tests included in the NSBMS, used as benchmark. As the logistic regression model did not result in a relevant improvement, it is concluded that most clinical variables influence both the SDMT and the NSBMS in a similar way. Excluding patients with possible practice effects, an optimal cutoff of 40 was found for the SDMT. Conclusion: As the SDMT is an easy, low-cost and fast test, this result may help to detect CI in everyday clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of a computerized version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in multiple sclerosis
    Akbar, Nadine
    Honarmand, Kimia
    Kou, Nancy
    Feinstein, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 258 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [2] Deconstructing the symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis: The role of memory
    Patel, Viral P.
    Walker, Lisa A. S.
    Feinstein, Anthony
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2017, 17 : 184 - 189
  • [3] Eye and hand motor interactions with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in early multiple sclerosis
    Nygaard, Gro O.
    Benavent, Sigrid A. de Rodez
    Harbo, Hanne F.
    Laeng, Bruno
    Sowa, Piotr
    Damangir, Soheil
    Nilsen, Kristian Bernhard
    Etholm, Lars
    Tonnesen, Siren
    Kerty, Emilia
    Drolsum, Liv
    Landro, Nils Inge
    Celius, Elisabeth G.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2015, 4 (06) : 585 - 589
  • [4] Trajectories of Symbol Digit Modalities Test performance in individuals with multiple sclerosis
    Healy, Brian C.
    Barker, Lindsay
    Bakshi, Rohit
    Benedict, Ralph H. B.
    Gonzalez, Cindy T.
    Chitnis, Tanuja
    Weiner, Howard L.
    Glanz, Bonnie, I
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (04) : 593 - 602
  • [5] Symbol Digit Modalities Test in progressive multiple sclerosis
    Gajewski, Bartosz
    Karlinska, Iwona
    Stasiolek, Mariusz
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2024, 58 (03) : 221 - 232
  • [6] Procedural Variations in the Stroop and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: Impact on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
    Hughes, Abbey J.
    Denney, Douglas R.
    Owens, Emily M.
    Lynch, Sharon G.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (05) : 452 - 462
  • [7] Functional representation of the symbol digit modalities test in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Grothe, Matthias
    Domin, Martin
    Hoffeld, Kai
    Nagels, Guy
    Lotze, Martin
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2020, 43
  • [8] Regression-Based Norms for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in the Dutch Population: Improving Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis?
    Burggraaff, Jessica
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J.
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 77 (5-6) : 246 - 252
  • [9] A Rapid Electronic Cognitive Assessment Measure for Multiple Sclerosis: Validation of Cognitive Reaction, an Electronic Version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test
    Middleton, Rod M.
    Pearson, Owen R.
    Ingram, Gillian
    Craig, Elaine M.
    Rodgers, William J.
    Downing-Wood, Hannah
    Hill, Joseph
    Tuite-Dalton, Katherine
    Roberts, Christopher
    Watson, Lynne
    Ford, David, V
    Nicholas, Richard
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (09)
  • [10] Validity of a computerized version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in multiple sclerosis
    Nadine Akbar
    Kimia Honarmand
    Nancy Kou
    Anthony Feinstein
    Journal of Neurology, 2011, 258 : 373 - 379