Multicriteria analysis of seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production at sea

被引:122
作者
d'Amore-Domenech, Rafael [1 ]
Santiago, Oscar [1 ,2 ]
Leo, Teresa J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETSI Navales, Dept Arquitectura Construcc & Sistemas Ocean & Na, Ave Memoria 4, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETS Ingn Aeronaut & Espacio, Dept Mecan Fluidos & Prop Aeroespacial, Plza Cardenal Cisneros 3, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
Multicriteria decision-making; MCDM; Seawater electrolysis; Sustainable hydrogen; Renewable energy; PEM electrolysis; Alkaline electrolysis; Solid oxide electrolysis; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; STEAM ELECTROLYSIS; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; ENERGY; STORAGE; CELL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110166
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The production of green hydrogen through the electrolysis of seawater using marine renewable energies offer numerous advantages. Nonetheless, the combination of marine renewables and electrolysis technologies has not reached commercial status yet. This study aims to see which electrolysis technology presents the best prospects of applicability in the short term by conducting a multicriteria comparison, where economic, environmental and social factors have been selected. Due to the different nature of the involved factors, the analysis is inherently complex. For its simplification, multicriteria decision-making methods are used. However, such methods could lead to various types of inconsistencies, and in order to avoid them, five distinct multicriteria decision-making methods have been employed. This combination enables checking the ranking consistency and its robustness, conferring the results a higher reliability. The results of the study reveal that Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis at sea presents the best prospects of applicability in the short term.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Abdel-Aal H., 2010, OPEN FUEL CELL J, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.2174/1875932701003010001
[2]   Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Beskese, Ahmet ;
Temur, Gul Tekin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (39) :18059-18076
[3]   Alkaline electrolysis cell at high temperature and pressure of 250 °C and 42 bar [J].
Allebrod, Frank ;
Chatzichristodoulou, Christodoulos ;
Mogensen, Mogens B. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2013, 229 :22-31
[4]   Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach [J].
Alonso, Jose Antonio ;
Lamata, M. Teresa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (04) :445-459
[5]   Modeling and performance optimization of a solid oxide electrolysis system for hydrogen production [J].
AlZahrani, Abdullah A. ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 :471-485
[6]   Chlorine-free alkaline seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production' [J].
Amikam, Gidon ;
Natiu, Paz ;
Gendel, Youri .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (13) :6504-6514
[7]   Monetary incentives to avoid deforestation under the Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) plus climate change mitigation scheme in Tanzania [J].
Araya, Meley M. ;
Hofstad, Ole .
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (03) :421-443
[8]   Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design [J].
Arroyo, P. ;
Tommelein, I. D. ;
Ballard, G. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (01)
[9]   A new method for applying choosing by advantages (CBA) multicriteria decision to a large number of design alternatives [J].
Arroyo, Paz ;
Mourgues, Claudio ;
Flager, Forest ;
Correa, Maria Gabriela .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 167 :30-37
[10]   The economics of wave energy: A review [J].
Astariz, S. ;
Iglesias, G. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 45 :397-408