Teaching mixed methods research: using a socio-ecological framework as a pedagogical approach for addressing the complexity of the field

被引:36
作者
Ivankova, N. V. [1 ,2 ]
Clark, V. L. Plano [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Hlth Profess, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Educ, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Mixed methods research; teaching; pedagogy; conceptual framework; socio-ecological model; ENGAGEMENT; SCIENCES; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2018.1427604
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Mixed methods research is growing in acceptance and complexity, which translates into significant pedagogical challenges for teaching about mixed methods research. To address this challenge and to contribute to creating a pedagogical culture for teaching research methods, we developed a practically focused conceptual framework for describing the field of mixed methods research and used this framework to structure an Introduction to Mixed Methods Research course. Our socio-ecological framework describes the field of mixed methods within three nested and interacting levels: the mixed methods research process, content, and contexts. The course introduces students to each level and its components and considers how the framework accounts for different perspectives, issues, and debates found within the field. Course evaluations suggest that the new pedagogical approach helps students successfully understand and navigate the complexity and nuances of the mixed methods field, and develop foundational knowledge for designing and implementing a mixed methods study.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 424
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences
    Alise, Mark A.
    Teddlie, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (02) : 103 - 126
  • [2] [Anonymous], MIXED METHODS RES NU
  • [3] Baran M., 2010, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, V4, P19, DOI [10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.019, DOI 10.5172/MRA.2010.4.1.019]
  • [4] Mosaics, Triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for Integrated Analysis in Mixed Methods Research
    Bazeley, Pat
    Kemp, Lynn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2012, 6 (01) : 55 - 72
  • [5] Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, ECOLOGY HUMAN DEV, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.4159/9780674028845]
  • [6] Bryman A., 2006, Qualitative Research, V6, P97, DOI DOI 10.1177/1468794106058877
  • [7] Profiles of Urban, Low SES, African American Girls' Attitudes Toward Science A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study
    Buck, Gayle
    Cook, Kristin
    Quigley, Cassie
    Eastwood, Jennifer
    Lucas, Yvonne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2009, 3 (04) : 386 - 410
  • [8] Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate a Community Intervention for Sexual Assault Survivors: A Methodological Tale
    Campbell, Rebecca
    Patterson, Debra
    Bybee, Deborah
    [J]. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2011, 17 (03) : 376 - 388
  • [9] Christ T., 2010, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, V2nd, P643
  • [10] Clark V.L. Plano., 2016, Mixed-methods research: A guide to the field