Eligibility of the movement-based classification systems in the diagnosis of patients with low back pain: A systematic review

被引:1
作者
Kajbafvala, Mehrnaz [1 ]
Rahmani, Nahid [2 ]
Bandpei, Mohammad Ali Mohseni [3 ,4 ]
Salavati, Mahyar [3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Rehabil Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Rehabil Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Pediat Neurorehabil Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Lahore, Inst Phys Therapy, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Movement; Classification; Low back pain; Reliability; Validity; Review; IMPAIRMENT-BASED CLASSIFICATION; PRIMARY-CARE RESEARCH; INTER-EXAMINER RELIABILITY; INTERTESTER RELIABILITY; INTERNATIONAL FORUM; MANAGEMENT; KNEE; PATTERNS; THERAPY; IRELAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.004
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the eligibility of the movement-based classification systems in the diagnosis of patients with low back pain. Methods: The present systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta -Analysis guidelines. Different databases including PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ProQuest and Google Scholar were searched from January 1990 to December 2017. All studies assessed the reliability and validity of the movement-based classification systems to diagnose patients with low back pain were included. The keywords used to search the studies were: "reliability", "validity", "classification", "movement impairment" and "low back pain". Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Results: Sixteen articles were met the inclusion criteria. Of these articles, 13 studies assessed the reliability and validity of movement-based classification systems to categorize patients with low back pain. Two out of 16 articles compared patients with low back pain and healthy subjects and one article had no control group. Conclusions: The results of the reviewed studies demonstrated that movement-based classification systems are valid and reliable enough to categorize patients with low back pain. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Razmjou H, 2000, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V30, P368, DOI 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.7.368
  • [42] INTERTESTER RELIABILITY OF MCKENZIE CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE SYNDROME TYPES PRESENT IN PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN
    RIDDLE, DL
    ROTHSTEIN, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 1993, 18 (10) : 1333 - 1344
  • [43] MUSING ON DIAGNOSIS
    ROSE, SJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1988, 68 (11): : 1665 - 1665
  • [44] DIAGNOSIS BY THE PHYSICAL THERAPIST - A PREREQUISITE FOR TREATMENT - A SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
    SAHRMANN, SA
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1988, 68 (11): : 1703 - 1706
  • [45] The Human Movement System: Our Professional Identity
    Sahrmann, Shirley A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 94 (07): : 1034 - 1042
  • [46] Spitzer W., 1987, Spine, V12, pS16, DOI DOI 10.1097/00007632-198709001-00007
  • [47] Interrater reliability of a movement impairment-based classification system for lumbar spine syndromes in patients with chronic low back pain
    Trudelle-Jackson, Elaine
    Sarvaiya-Shah, Shweta A.
    Wang, Sharon S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 38 (06) : 371 - 376
  • [48] Movement system impairment-based categories for low back pain: Stage 1 validation
    Van Dillen, LR
    Sahrmann, SA
    Norton, BJ
    Caldwell, CA
    McDonnell, MK
    Bloom, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 33 (03) : 126 - 142
  • [49] Costs of back pain in Germany
    Wenig, Christina M.
    Schmidt, Carsten O.
    Kohlmann, Thomas
    Schweikert, Bernd
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 13 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [50] Willis S., 2015, INTERRATER RELIABILI