Eligibility of the movement-based classification systems in the diagnosis of patients with low back pain: A systematic review

被引:1
作者
Kajbafvala, Mehrnaz [1 ]
Rahmani, Nahid [2 ]
Bandpei, Mohammad Ali Mohseni [3 ,4 ]
Salavati, Mahyar [3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Rehabil Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Rehabil Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Pediat Neurorehabil Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Lahore, Inst Phys Therapy, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Movement; Classification; Low back pain; Reliability; Validity; Review; IMPAIRMENT-BASED CLASSIFICATION; PRIMARY-CARE RESEARCH; INTER-EXAMINER RELIABILITY; INTERTESTER RELIABILITY; INTERNATIONAL FORUM; MANAGEMENT; KNEE; PATTERNS; THERAPY; IRELAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.004
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the eligibility of the movement-based classification systems in the diagnosis of patients with low back pain. Methods: The present systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta -Analysis guidelines. Different databases including PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ProQuest and Google Scholar were searched from January 1990 to December 2017. All studies assessed the reliability and validity of the movement-based classification systems to diagnose patients with low back pain were included. The keywords used to search the studies were: "reliability", "validity", "classification", "movement impairment" and "low back pain". Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Results: Sixteen articles were met the inclusion criteria. Of these articles, 13 studies assessed the reliability and validity of movement-based classification systems to categorize patients with low back pain. Two out of 16 articles compared patients with low back pain and healthy subjects and one article had no control group. Conclusions: The results of the reviewed studies demonstrated that movement-based classification systems are valid and reliable enough to categorize patients with low back pain. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alexandria V., 1997, PHYS THER, V77, P1163
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, ICF INT CLASFUNCT
  • [3] MANAGING LOW-BACK-PAIN - ATTITUDES AND TREATMENT PREFERENCES OF PHYSICAL-THERAPISTS
    BATTIE, MC
    CHERKIN, DC
    DUNN, R
    CIOL, MA
    WHEELER, KJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (03): : 219 - 226
  • [4] An agenda for primary care research on low back pain
    Borkan, JM
    Cherkin, DC
    [J]. SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) : 2880 - 2884
  • [5] A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain - Reexamining priorities
    Borkan, JM
    Koes, B
    Reis, S
    Cherkin, DC
    [J]. SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) : 1992 - 1996
  • [6] Exercise therapy for low back pain: A small-scale exploratory survey of current physiotherapy practice in the Republic of Ireland acute hospital setting
    Byrne, Karol
    Doody, Catherine
    Hurley, Deirdre A.
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (04) : 272 - 278
  • [7] The Ninth International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain
    Cherkin, Daniel
    Kovacs, Francisco M.
    Croft, Peter
    Borkan, Jeffrey
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Oberg, Birgitta
    Urrutia, Gerard
    Zamora, Javier
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (03) : 304 - 307
  • [8] Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain
    Clare, HA
    Adams, R
    Maher, CG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 28 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [9] Clare HA., 2004, Physiotherapy, V90, P114
  • [10] Differences in sitting postures are associated with nonspecific chronic low back pain disorders when patients are subclassified
    Dankaerts, W
    O'Sullivan, P
    Burnett, A
    Straker, LM
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) : 698 - 704