Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:498
作者
Morris, Zoe [1 ]
Whiteley, William N.
Longstreth, W. T., Jr. [2 ,3 ]
Weber, Frank [4 ]
Lee, Yi-Chung [5 ]
Tsushima, Yoshito [6 ]
Alphs, Hannah [7 ]
Ladd, Susanne C. [8 ]
Warlow, Charles [1 ]
Wardlaw, Joanna M. [1 ,9 ]
Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Div Clin Neurosci, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] German AF Inst Aviat Med, Dept Neurol, Fuerstenfeldbruck, Germany
[5] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Gunma Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Nucl Med, Gunma, Japan
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[8] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Neuroradiol, Essen, Germany
[9] Univ Edinburgh, SFC Brain Imaging Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2009年 / 339卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
UNRUPTURED INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; MR; RECOMMENDATIONS; MALFORMATIONS; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.b3016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To quantify the prevalence of incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Data sources Ovid Medline (1950 to May 2008), Embase (1980 to May 2008), and bibliographies of relevant articles. Review methods Two reviewers sought and assessed studies of people without neurological symptoms who underwent MRI of the brain with or without intravenous contrast for research purposes or for occupational, clinical, or commercial screening. Main outcome measures Overall disease specific and age specific prevalence of incidental brain findings, calculated by meta-analysis of pooled proportions using DerSimonian-Laird weights in a random effects model. Results In 16 studies, 135 of 19 559 people had neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 0.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.47% to 0.98%), and prevalence increased with age (chi(2) for linear trend, P=0.003). In 15 studies, 375 of 15 559 people had nonneoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 2.0%, 1.1% to 3.1%, excluding white matter hyperintensities, silent infarcts, and microbleeds). The number of asymptomatic people needed to scan to detect any incidental brain finding was 37. The prevalence of incidental brain findings was higher in studies using high resolution MRI sequences than in those using standard resolution sequences (4.3% v 1.7%, P<0.001). The prevalence of neoplastic incidental brain findings increased with age. Conclusions Incidental findings on brain MRI are common, prevalence increases with age, and detection is more likely using high resolution MRI sequences than standard resolution sequences. These findings deserve to be mentioned when obtaining informed consent for brain MRI in research and clinical practice but are not sufficient to justify screening healthy asymptomatic people.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 550
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Recommendations for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association [J].
Bederson, JB ;
Awed, IA ;
Wiebers, DO ;
Piepgras, D ;
Haley, EC ;
Brott, T ;
Hademenos, G ;
Chyatte, D ;
Rosenwasser, R ;
Caroselli, C .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (11) :2742-2750
[2]  
BRYAN RN, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1625
[3]   Low-grade gliomas: an update on pathology and therapy [J].
Cavaliere, R ;
Lopes, MBS ;
Schiff, D .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2005, 4 (11) :760-770
[4]   Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting [J].
Cordonnier, Charlotte ;
Salman, Rustarn Ai-Shahi ;
Wardlaw, Joanna .
BRAIN, 2007, 130 :1988-2003
[5]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[6]   Communicating about screening [J].
Entwistle, Vikki A. ;
Carter, Stacy M. ;
Trevena, Lyndal ;
Flitcroft, Kathy ;
Irwig, Les ;
McCaffery, Kirsten ;
Salkeld, Glenn .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7673) :a1591
[7]  
Göhde SC, 2002, RADIOLOGE, V42, P622, DOI 10.1007/s00117-002-0798-y
[8]  
*HLTH CAN, 2003, WHOL BOD SCREEN US M
[9]   The high incidence and bioethics of findings on magnetic resonance brain imaging of normal volunteers for neuroscience research [J].
Hoggard, N. ;
Darwent, G. ;
Capener, D. ;
Wilkinson, I. D. ;
Griffiths, P. D. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2009, 35 (03) :194-199
[10]   Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache [J].
Howard, L ;
Wessely, S ;
Leese, M ;
Page, L ;
McCrone, P ;
Husain, K ;
Tong, J ;
Dowson, A .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 (11) :1558-1564