A probabilistic algorithm to test local algebraic observability in polynomial time

被引:105
作者
Sedoglavic, A [1 ]
机构
[1] INRIA Rocquencourt, Projet Algorithmes, F-78153 Le Chesnay, France
[2] Ecole Polytech, Lab GAGE, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jsco.2002.0532
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The following questions are often encountered in system and control theory. Given an algebraic model of a physical process, which variables can be, in theory, deduced from the input-output behaviour of an experiment? How many of the remaining variables should we assume to be known in order to determine all the others? These questions are parts of the local algebraic observability problem which is concerned with the existence of a non-trivial Lie subalgebra of model's symmetries letting the inputs and the outputs be invariant. We present a probabilistic seminumerical algorithm that proposes a solution to this problem in polynomial tunc. A bound for the necessary number of arithmetic operations on the rational field is presented, This bound is polynomial in the complexity of evaluation of the model and in the number of variables. Furthermore, we show that the size of the integers involved in the computations is polynomial in the number of variables and in the degree of the system. Last, we estimate the probability of success of our algorithm. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 755
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1961, P 1 INT C AUTOMATIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Proc. 1st Europ. Control Conf
[3]  
[Anonymous], FORUM MATH
[4]   THE COMPLEXITY OF PARTIAL DERIVATIVES [J].
BAUR, W ;
STRASSEN, V .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1983, 22 (03) :317-330
[5]  
Beckermann Bernhard, 1992, NUMER ALGORITHMS, V3, P45
[6]  
Boulier F., 1995, Proceedings of the 1995 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, ISSAC '95, P158, DOI 10.1145/220346.220367
[7]  
BOULIER F, 199914 LIFL U LILL 1
[8]   FAST ALGORITHMS FOR MANIPULATING FORMAL POWER-SERIES [J].
BRENT, RP ;
KUNG, HT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1978, 25 (04) :581-595
[9]  
BURGISSER P, 1997, GMW, V315
[10]   Kronecker's and Newton's approaches to solving:: A first comparison [J].
Castro, D ;
Pardo, LM ;
Hägele, K ;
Morais, JE .
JOURNAL OF COMPLEXITY, 2001, 17 (01) :212-303