In vitro activity of linezolid against clinical isolates of Fusobacterium spp.

被引:2
作者
Daeschlein, G.
Hoehne, C.
Assadian, O. [1 ]
Daxboeck, F.
Meinl, C.
Kramer, A.
Kekule, A. S.
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Hyg & Med Microbiol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Greifswald, Inst Hyg & Environm Med, Greifswald, Germany
[3] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Microbiol, Halle, Germany
关键词
anaerobic bacteria; susceptibility; MIC; resistance; amoxicillin; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkl338
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Although most susceptibility studies for linezolid have investigated aerobic bacteria, only a few have investigated anaerobe isolates. The aim of the present study was to determine the antibacterial activity of linezolid against a larger sample of clinical isolates of Fusobacterium spp. and to report on the detailed susceptibility, stratified by species. Methods: The in vitro susceptibility of 80 clinical isolates of Fusobacterium (Fusobacterium necrophorum, n = 34; Fusobacterium nucleatum, n = 20; Fusobacterium varium, n = 18; Fusobacterium mortiferum; n = 8) was tested and compared with the activity of the older compounds amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Results: The MIC of linezolid ranged from 0.016 to 1.0 mg/L, with the MIC90 being 0.5 mg/L. The highest MIC obtained for linezolid (1.0 mg/L) was measured for an F. varium isolate. The MIC90 for both, amoxicillin (range: 0.016-0.75 mg/L) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (range: 0.047-0.75 mg/L), was 0.5 mg/L. Overall, no resistant strains were found in the study. Conclusions: Compared with amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, linezolid was less active against F. necrophorum (MIC90 0.25 mg/L) and F. nucleatum (MIC90 0.25 mg/L), equally active against F. varium (MIC90 0.75 mg/L) and slightly more active against F. mortiferum (MIC90 0.19 mg/L).
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 793
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Multicenter survey of the changing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, and Peptostreptococcus species [J].
Aldridge, KE ;
Ashcraft, D ;
Cambre, K ;
Pierson, CL ;
Jenkins, SG ;
Rosenblatt, JE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 45 (04) :1238-1243
[2]   Activity of linezolid against anaerobic bacteria [J].
Behra-Miellet, J ;
Calvet, L ;
Dubreuil, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2003, 22 (01) :28-34
[3]   Surveillance of linezolid resistance in Germany, 2001-2002 [J].
Brauers, J ;
Kresken, M ;
Hafner, D ;
Shah, PM .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2005, 11 (01) :39-46
[4]   RECOVERY OF ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA FROM CLINICAL SPECIMENS IN 12 YEARS AT 2 MILITARY HOSPITALS [J].
BROOK, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 26 (06) :1181-1188
[5]   In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria [J].
Citron, DM ;
Merriam, CV ;
Tyrrell, KL ;
Warren, YA ;
Fernandez, H ;
Goldstein, EJC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (07) :2334-2338
[6]   Linezolid [J].
Clemett, D ;
Markham, A .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (04) :815-827
[7]  
Deutsches Institut Fur Normung e. V. (DIN), 2004, 589404 DIN
[8]   Oxazolidinones - A review [J].
Diekema, DJ ;
Jones, RN .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (01) :7-16
[9]  
Edlund Charlotta, 1999, Clin Microbiol Infect, V5, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1999.tb00099.x
[10]   Anti-anaerobic activity of AZD2563, a new oxazolidinone, compared with eight other agents [J].
Ednie, LM ;
Jacobs, MR ;
Appelbaum, PC .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (01) :101-105