Safety propensity index for signalized and unsignalized intersections: Exploration and assessment

被引:14
作者
Schorr, Justin P. [1 ]
Hamdar, Samer H. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Intelligent Syst Res, Traff & Networks Res Lab, Ashburn, VA 20147 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Index; Intersections; Safety; Signals; Structural equations; Traffic; SEVERITY LEVELS; CRASHES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.008
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to develop a safety propensity index (SPI) for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. Through the use of a structural equation modelling (SEM) approach safety is quantified in terms of multiple endogenous variables and related to various dimensions of exogenous variables. The singular valued SPI allows for identification of relationships between variables and lends itself well to a comparative analysis between models. The data provided by the Highway Safety Information System (HSIS) for the California transportation network was utilized for analysis. In total 22,422 collisions at unsignalized intersections and 20,215 collisions at signalized intersections (occurring between 2006 and 2010) were considered in the final models. The main benefits of the approach and the subsequent development of an SPI are (1) the identification of pertinent variables that effect safety at both intersection types, (2) the identification of similarities and differences at both types of intersections through model comparison, and (3) the quantification of safety in the form of an index such that a ranking system can be developed. If further developed, the adopted methodology may assist in safety related decision making and policy analysis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 105
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Isebrands H., 2010, J TRANSPORT ENG
[22]  
Jung S., 2012, J TRANSPORT ENG
[23]   Effects of road geometry and traffic volumes on rural roadway accident rates [J].
Karlaftis, MG ;
Golias, I .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2002, 34 (03) :357-365
[24]   Modeling crash types: New insights into the effects of covariates on crashes at rural intersections [J].
Kim, DG ;
Washington, S ;
Oh, J .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (04) :282-292
[25]   CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT R2 [J].
KVALSETH, TO .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1985, 39 (04) :279-285
[26]   Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models [J].
Lee, Ju-Yeon ;
Chung, Jin-Hyuk ;
Son, Bongsoo .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2008, 40 (06) :1955-1963
[27]   JOINT EFFECTS OF ACCESS AND GEOMETRY ON 2-LANE RURAL HIGHWAY SAFETY IN BRITISH-COLUMBIA [J].
LI, J ;
ABDELWAHAB, W ;
BROWN, G .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1994, 21 (06) :1012-1024
[28]  
Meurs H., 1986, DEV STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[29]  
National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2009, 500 NAT COOP HIGHW R
[30]   General fuzzy rule base for isolated traffic signal control-rule formulation [J].
Niittymäki, J .
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 24 (03) :227-247