Utility of stereoscopic displays for indirect-vision driving and robot teleoperation

被引:11
作者
Chen, Jessie Y. C. [1 ]
Oden, Razia V. N. [2 ]
Merritt, John O. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Army Res Lab, Human Res & Engn Directorate, Orlando, FL 32826 USA
[2] Design Interact Inc, Oviedo, FL USA
[3] Merritt Grp, Williamsburg, MA USA
关键词
stereoscopic display; human-robot interaction; indirect-vision driving; simulation; military; visual discomfort; PERCEPTION; 3D; PERFORMANCE; HAZARDS; 2D;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2013.859739
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of an active shutter-glasses stereoscopic display (SD) and a passive polarised SD was evaluated in a live robot-teleoperation task and a simulated indirect-vision driving task in various terrains. Overall, participants completed their tasks significantly faster with the SDs in three-dimensional (3D) mode than with the SDs in the baseline 2D mode. They also navigated more accurately with the SDs in 3D mode. When the effectiveness of the two types of SDs was examined separately, results showed that the active shutter-glasses SD resulted in faster responses and task completion times than the passive polarised SD, though most of the differences failed to reach statistical significance. Perceived workload when interacting with the two SD systems did not differ significantly between the active versus passive display types or between the 3D and 2D modes of operation; however, participants reported more severe discomfort after interacting with the passive polarised SD. Practitioner Summary: This study demonstrated the utility of SDs for enhancing operators' navigation-related performance. The results furthered the understanding of the differential effectiveness of an active stereoscopic system versus a passive system. The findings will facilitate the implementation of stereoscopic systems for robotics control and indirect-vision driving in military settings.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 22
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Perception of terrain drop-offs as a function of L-R viewpoint separation in stereoscopic video [J].
Merritt, JO ;
CuQlock-Knopp, VG ;
Kregel, M ;
Smoot, J ;
Monaco, W .
Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays X: Technologies and Applications, 2005, 5800 :169-176
[22]   Enhanced perception of terrain hazards in off-road path choice: Stereoscopic 3D versus 2D displays [J].
Merritt, JO ;
CuQlockKnopp, VG ;
Myles, K .
TARGETS AND BACKGROUNDS: CHARACTERIZATION AND REPRESENTATION III, 1997, 3062 :101-104
[23]   A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure [J].
Noyes, Jan M. ;
Bruneau, Daniel P. J. .
ERGONOMICS, 2007, 50 (04) :514-519
[24]   Comparison between 2-D & 3-D using an auto stereoscopic display: The effects of viewing field and illumination on performance and visual fatigue [J].
Ntuen, Celestine A. ;
Goings, Michael ;
Reddin, Michael ;
Holmes, Ken .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2009, 39 (02) :388-395
[25]  
Pezzaniti J. L., 2009, P STER DISPL APPL 20, V7237
[26]   Perception of 3D spatial relations for 3D displays [J].
Rosen, P ;
Pizlo, Z ;
Hoffmann, C ;
Popescu, V .
STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS XI, 2004, 5291 :9-16
[27]  
ROSENBERG LB, 1993, IEEE VIRTUAL REALITY ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, P27, DOI 10.1109/VRAIS.1993.380802
[28]  
Scribner D, 1998, ARLTR1598
[29]  
Singer M.J., 1995, 1034 US ARM RES I BE
[30]  
Spain E., 1991, OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT