Low incidence of complications using polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) mesh in breast reconstruction: A systematic review

被引:25
作者
Rodriguez-Unda, Nelson [1 ]
Leiva, Stephanie [1 ]
Cheng, Hsu-Tang [1 ]
Seal, Stella M. [2 ]
Cooney, Carisa M. [1 ]
Rosson, Gedge D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, William H Welch Med Lib, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Vicryl mesh; Mastectomy; Systematic review; Implant tissue expander; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DATABASE; ABSORBABLE MESH; FOLLOW-UP; SURGERY; INSERTION; OUTCOMES; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.06.018
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mastectomy and breast reconstruction are essential parts of the treatment of breast cancer. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have been used for the reconstruction of the lower pole due to many advantages; however, its cost is seen as a major drawback in this era of concern for the allocation of health-care funds. Recently, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) mesh has been published as an alternative. We assessed the published literature, in particular investigating for studies that compare Vicryl mesh with ADM. Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Searched databases included Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials, and SCOPUS. Search criteria were as follows: (1) reporting of clinical data using Vicryl mesh in breast reconstruction, (2) reporting of original data, and (3) outcome of interest reported. Results: We retrieved 290 de-duplicated articles. After title and abstract screening, we dismissed 258 articles, and thus full text was reviewed for 32 articles; only three retrospective articles met inclusion criteria. The total population included 112 patients and 156 breasts. The reported incidence of complications was as follows: infection 2.6% (confidence interval (CI): 0.7-6.6%), reconstruction failure 3.2% (CI: 1.0-7%), and seroma 1.3% (CI: 0.2-4.6%). A sevento 12-fold cost difference was reported. Follow-up length ranged from 1.2 to 3.6 years. No studies directly compared Vicryl mesh with ADM. Conclusions: Although the evidence is limited, polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) mesh for immediate breast reconstruction appears to be a potentially safe, effective, and less expensive alternative to ADM. Prospective studies are needed to further compare mesh with ADM. (C) 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1543 / 1549
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 Vintage 2009 Populations
  • [2] The Role of Physicians in Controlling Medical Care Costs and Reducing Waste
    Brook, Robert H.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (06): : 650 - 651
  • [3] Analysis of Infections Occurring in Breast Cancer Patients after Breast Conserving Surgery Using Mesh
    Cho, Jin Seong
    Shin, Sun Hyoung
    Park, Ji Young
    Song, Young Ju
    Yi, Jeong Min
    Park, Min Ho
    Yoon, Jung Han
    Jegal, Young Jong
    Yi, Ji Sin
    An, Seong Ja
    Lim, Hwo Soon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2011, 14 (04) : 328 - 332
  • [4] Acellular Dermal Matrix in Irradiated Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Evidence-Based Review
    Clemens, Mark W.
    Kronowitz, Steven J.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (05) : 27S - 34S
  • [5] Biocompatibility, cell growth and clinical relevance of synthetic meshes and biological matrixes for internal support in implant-based breast reconstruction
    Dieterich, Max
    Stubert, Johannes
    Gerber, Bernd
    Reimer, Toralf
    Richter, Dagmar-Ulrike
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (06) : 1371 - 1379
  • [6] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP Bra): A Multicenter Study of 231 Cases
    Dieterich, Max
    Paepke, Stefan
    Zwiefel, Karin
    Dieterich, Holger
    Blohmer, Jens
    Faridi, Andree
    Klein, Evelyn
    Gerber, Bernd
    Nestle-Kraemling, Carolin
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (01) : 8E - 19E
  • [7] FLEISS JL, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P378, DOI 10.1037/h0031619
  • [8] Geertzen J., 2012, Interrater agreement with multiple raters and variables
  • [9] Comparison Study of Two Types of Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Versus Total Submuscular Placement
    Hanna, Kasandra R.
    DeGeorge, Brent R., Jr.
    Mericli, Alexander F.
    Lin, Kant Y.
    Drake, David B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [10] Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study
    Hartling, Lisa
    Ospina, Maria
    Liang, Yuanyuan
    Dryden, Donna M.
    Hooton, Nicola
    Seida, Jennifer Krebs
    Klassen, Terry P.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 1017