Selecting Globally Sustainable Materials: A Case Study Using Choosing by Advantages

被引:33
作者
Arroyo, Paz [1 ]
Tommelein, Iris D. [2 ,3 ]
Ballard, Glenn [4 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Engn, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Project Prod Syst Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Project Prod Syst Lab, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Decision-making; Material selection; Choosing by advantages (CBA); Sustainability; Design management; Supply chain management; Project planning and design;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001041
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design teams must make numerous decisions in building design, including choosing materials. Lately, they have become more concerned about the social and environmental effects of their choices, in addition to the economic constraints. These concerns, in addition to the increasing offerings of construction materials and products and the engagement of more stakeholders, make decisions more complex. As decision complexity increases, so does the need to systematically use sound decision-making methods. However, in practice many decisions are made without a formal method or discussion, thereby often generating conflict and waste in the design process. Further, even if practitioners are looking for better decision-making methods, the literature does not provide enough support for them to choose the best method for this context. This research fills the literature gap and provides a systematic approach as well as practical advice for decision makers by demonstrating the application of a method, called choosing by advantages (CBA). CBA creates transparent and collaborative environments in which to make decisions. To illustrate the use of CBA, this paper provides a detailed example of choosing materials, in this case ceiling tiles, in a commercial interior design project considering global supply chain issues. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by illustrating how to use CBA for (1)integrating multiple perspectives, (2)identifying relevant sustainability factors, (3)making transparent trade-offs, (4)documenting a decision rationale, (5)separating value from cost, (6)organizing location-dependent factors, and (7)incorporating supply chain issues. CBA is a method worth adding to the toolbox of design teams determined to chose globally sustainable materials. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code [J].
Aguado, Antonio ;
del Cano, Alfredo ;
Pilar de la Cruz, M. ;
Gomez, Diego ;
Josa, Alejandro .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 138 (02) :268-276
[2]   Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects [J].
Akadiri, Peter O. ;
Olomolaiye, Paul O. ;
Chinyio, Ezekiel A. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 30 :113-125
[3]  
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2012, D327312 ASTM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE
[6]  
[Anonymous], VULNERABILITY UNCERT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials
[8]   Quantification of Sustainability Index for Underground Utility Infrastructure Projects [J].
Ariaratnam, Samuel T. ;
Piratla, Kalyan ;
Cohen, Aaron ;
Olson, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (12)
[9]  
Armstrong, 2012, OPT CEIL PAN HIGH PE
[10]   Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design [J].
Arroyo, P. ;
Tommelein, I. D. ;
Ballard, G. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (01)