Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation

被引:10
|
作者
Park, Yunseo Linda [1 ]
Hunter, Jared [1 ]
Sheldon, Breanna L. [1 ]
Sabourin, Shelby [1 ]
DiMarzio, Marisa [1 ]
Khazen, Olga [1 ]
Pilitsis, Julie G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosurg, Albany, NY 12208 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2021年 / 24卷 / 08期
关键词
Chronic pain; interoceptive awareness; multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness; neuromodulation; pain scores; spinal cord stimulation; DISABILITY; ANXIETY; BACK; QUESTIONNAIRE; DEPRESSION; EFFICACY; THERAPY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1111/ner.13318
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives Meditation has been shown to improve outcomes for chronic pain by increasing patients' awareness of their own bodies. Some patients have an innate ability to leverage their mind-body connection, and this interoceptive awareness may aid them in garnering pain relief. We explored whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients with greater innate awareness had better outcomes. Materials and Methods We contacted 30 thoracic SCS patients with baseline and postoperative pain, psychological, and disability outcomes to complete the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) survey. MAIA distinguishes between beneficial and maladaptive aspects of the perception of body sensations via six positive subscales (noticing, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trusting) and two negative subscales (not distracting, not worrying). MAIA subscales and positive/negative groups were correlated with percentage change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Results Patients included 14 males/16 females with a mean age of 58. At a mean follow-up of 14.13 months (range 6-26), NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS, and MPQ showed improvements. Positive traits correlated with improvements in pain (MAIA-self regulation with NRS-worst [p = 0.018], NRS-least [p = 0.042], NRS-average [p = 0.006], NRS-current [p = 0.001]; MAIA-body listening with MPQ-total [p = 0.016] and MPQ-sensory [p = 0.026]). Improvement in PCS-total was associated with higher scores in noticing (p = 0.002), attention regulation (p = 0.017), emotional awareness (p = 0.039), and trusting (p = 0.047). PCS-rumination correlated with MAIA-positive total (p = 0.012). In contrast, better attention regulation signified less improvement in ODI (p = 0.043) and MPQ affective (p = 0.026). Conclusions Higher interoceptive awareness in SCS patients correlated with greater improvement following the procedure, particularly with regards to pain relief and pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that patients with better mind-body connections may achieve greater pain relief following SCS in this patient population, thereby aiding providers in determining who may benefit from this intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of Chronic Pain in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
    Celik Avluk, Ozlem
    Gurcay, Eda
    Karaahmet, Ozgur Zeliha
    Gurcay, Ahmet Gurhan
    Gurcan, Oktay
    Cakci, Aytul
    TURKIYE FIZIKSEL TIP VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 60 (03): : 188 - 193
  • [42] The role of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain postlaminectomy
    Krishna Kumar
    Cory Toth
    Current Review of Pain, 1998, 2 (2): : 85 - 92
  • [43] New advancements in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management
    Xu, Jijun
    Liu, Aijun
    Cheng, Jianguo
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (06) : 710 - 717
  • [44] Selection of spinal cord stimulation candidates for the treatment of chronic pain
    Deer, Timothy
    Masone, Robert J.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2008, 9 : S82 - S92
  • [45] BurstDR spinal cord stimulation rebalances pain input and pain suppression in the brain in chronic neuropathic pain
    Vanneste, Sven
    De Ridder, Dirk
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2023, 16 (04) : 1186 - 1195
  • [46] Perceptions of pain in aging females undergoing spinal cord stimulation
    Abdullah, Umm E. Hani
    Kelly, Sophie
    Ricker, Adam
    Nabage, Melisande
    Khazen, Olga
    Telkes, Ilknur
    Dimarzio, Marisa
    Wilson, Candy
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2023, 13 (12) : 701 - 708
  • [47] Successful spinal cord stimulation for chronic pancreatitis and post-laminectomy pain
    Cox, Cody J.
    Wilkinson, Michael M.
    Erdek, Michael A.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [48] Spinal Cord Stimulation Explantation and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Technology Recommendations
    Wahezi, Sayed E.
    Yener, Ugur
    Naeimi, Tahereh
    Lewis, Joshua B.
    Yerra, Sandeep
    Sgobba, Philip
    Ciftci, Hatice Begum
    Vydyanathan, Amaresh
    Chiu, Elisa
    Cherkalin, Denis
    Darji, Jay Y.
    Masterson, Ryan
    Lee, Danielle
    Jarusriwanna, Atthakorn
    Palee, Suwannika
    Ortiz, Nicole R.
    Caparo, Moorice
    Dayon, Eli
    Fontaine, Camille
    Bikson, Marom
    Schatman, Michael E.
    Pritzlaff, Scott G.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Hunter, Corey W.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2025, 18 : 1327 - 1340
  • [49] Prospective Analysis of the Trial Period for Spinal Cord Stimulation Treatment for Chronic Pain
    Chincholkar, Mahindra
    Eldabe, Sam
    Strachan, Roger
    Brookes, Morag
    Garner, Fay
    Chadwick, Raymond
    Gulve, Ashish
    Ness, Jill
    NEUROMODULATION, 2011, 14 (06): : 523 - 528
  • [50] Evolving Spinal Cord Stimulation Technologies and Clinical Implications in Chronic Pain Management
    Viswanath, Omar
    Urits, Ivan
    Bouley, Emily
    Peck, Jacquelin M.
    Thompson, William
    Kaye, Alan David
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2019, 23 (06)