Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation

被引:10
|
作者
Park, Yunseo Linda [1 ]
Hunter, Jared [1 ]
Sheldon, Breanna L. [1 ]
Sabourin, Shelby [1 ]
DiMarzio, Marisa [1 ]
Khazen, Olga [1 ]
Pilitsis, Julie G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosurg, Albany, NY 12208 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2021年 / 24卷 / 08期
关键词
Chronic pain; interoceptive awareness; multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness; neuromodulation; pain scores; spinal cord stimulation; DISABILITY; ANXIETY; BACK; QUESTIONNAIRE; DEPRESSION; EFFICACY; THERAPY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1111/ner.13318
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives Meditation has been shown to improve outcomes for chronic pain by increasing patients' awareness of their own bodies. Some patients have an innate ability to leverage their mind-body connection, and this interoceptive awareness may aid them in garnering pain relief. We explored whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients with greater innate awareness had better outcomes. Materials and Methods We contacted 30 thoracic SCS patients with baseline and postoperative pain, psychological, and disability outcomes to complete the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) survey. MAIA distinguishes between beneficial and maladaptive aspects of the perception of body sensations via six positive subscales (noticing, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trusting) and two negative subscales (not distracting, not worrying). MAIA subscales and positive/negative groups were correlated with percentage change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Results Patients included 14 males/16 females with a mean age of 58. At a mean follow-up of 14.13 months (range 6-26), NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS, and MPQ showed improvements. Positive traits correlated with improvements in pain (MAIA-self regulation with NRS-worst [p = 0.018], NRS-least [p = 0.042], NRS-average [p = 0.006], NRS-current [p = 0.001]; MAIA-body listening with MPQ-total [p = 0.016] and MPQ-sensory [p = 0.026]). Improvement in PCS-total was associated with higher scores in noticing (p = 0.002), attention regulation (p = 0.017), emotional awareness (p = 0.039), and trusting (p = 0.047). PCS-rumination correlated with MAIA-positive total (p = 0.012). In contrast, better attention regulation signified less improvement in ODI (p = 0.043) and MPQ affective (p = 0.026). Conclusions Higher interoceptive awareness in SCS patients correlated with greater improvement following the procedure, particularly with regards to pain relief and pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that patients with better mind-body connections may achieve greater pain relief following SCS in this patient population, thereby aiding providers in determining who may benefit from this intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Costantini, Amedeo
    Buchser, Eric
    Van Buyten, Jean Pierre
    NEUROMODULATION, 2010, 13 (04): : 275 - 280
  • [22] Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Bradley, Kerry
    Kapural, Leonardo
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (14) : S53 - S60
  • [23] Disease applications of spinal cord stimulation: Chronic nonmalignant pain
    Sammartino, Francesco
    MacDonell, Jacquelyn
    North, Richard B.
    Krishna, Vibhor
    Poree, Lawrence
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2024, 21 (03)
  • [24] Long-term explantation risk in patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord or dorsal root ganglion stimulation
    Gatzinsky, Kliment
    Brink, Beatrice
    Eygloardottir, Kristin Lilja
    Hallen, Tobias
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [25] Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain
    Fontaine, D.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2021, 177 (07) : 838 - 842
  • [26] Innovations in spinal cord stimulation for pain
    Lempka, Scott F.
    Patil, Parag G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 8 : 51 - 60
  • [27] 1.2kHzHigh-Frequency Stimulation as a Rescue Therapy in Patients With Chronic Pain Refractory to Conventional Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Andrade, Pablo
    Heiden, Petra
    Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
    Matis, Georgios
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (03): : 540 - 545
  • [28] A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
    Verrills, Paul
    Sinclair, Chantelle
    Barnard, Adele
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 481 - 492
  • [29] Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: technical advances
    Isagulyan, Emil
    Slavin, Konstantin
    Konovalov, Nikolay
    Dorochov, Eugeny
    Tomsky, Alexey
    Dekopov, Andrey
    Makashova, Elizaveta
    Isagulyan, David
    Genov, Pavel
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 33 (02): : 99 - 107
  • [30] Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
    Chitneni, Ahish
    Jain, Esha
    Sahni, Sidharth
    Mavrocordatos, Philippe
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2024, 28 (07) : 595 - 605