Discrimination in marketized welfare services: a field experiment on Swedish schools

被引:4
|
作者
Taghizadeh, JonasLarsson [1 ]
Adman, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Govt, Box 514, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
marketization; cream skimming; field experiment; discrimination; school vouchers; for-profit; NAMES;
D O I
10.1017/S0047279422000940
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Providers' tendency to cream skim clients according to certain sociodemographic traits is widely believed to increase under marketization, and therefore also discrimination. However, due to a lack of experimental research, little is known about the presence of discrimination in marketized welfare services and of the potential drivers of such biased treatment. The lack of research is particularly evident in regard to socioeconomic status (SES) discrimination and publicly financed for-profit providers. Moreover, competition, an important aspect of marketization, has not been investigated. Focusing on the interesting case of the Swedish school sector, we aim to improve knowledge on these matters. In a field experiment, 3,430 elementary school principals were randomly contacted though e-mail by parents with Arabic- or Swedish-sounding names and in low- or high-socioeconomic professions. The fictional parents were interested in placing their children at the school. The Swedish school sector resembles marketized public services in several Western countries. The results show clear signs of ethnic as well as SES discrimination, particularly in regard to more qualitative aspects of the replies. However, we find no significant differences in discrimination between public and private/for-profit schools and depending on the degree of competition in the school market.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1125
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Age discrimination in hiring decisions: Evidence from a field experiment in the labor market
    Carlsson, Magnus
    Eriksson, Stefan
    LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2019, 59 : 173 - 183
  • [22] Ethnic discrimination by Members of the German Parliament A field experiment
    Hess, Moritz
    von Scheve, Christian
    Zittlau, Steffen
    SOZIALE WELT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2018, 69 (04): : 355 - 378
  • [23] Gender differences in bargaining outcomes: A field experiment on discrimination
    Castillo, Marco
    Petrie, Ragan
    Torero, Maximo
    Vesterlund, Lise
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2013, 99 : 35 - 48
  • [24] Discrimination in the rental housing market: A field experiment on the Internet
    Ahmed, Ali M.
    Hammarstedt, Mats
    JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (02) : 362 - 372
  • [25] Discrimination in Health Care: A Field Experiment on the Impact of Patients' Socioeconomic Status on Access to Care
    Angerer, Silvia
    Waibel, Christian
    Stummer, Harald
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 5 (04) : 407 - 427
  • [26] Contexts and conditions of ethnic discrimination: Evidence from a field experiment in a German housing market
    Auspurg, Katrin
    Hinz, Thomas
    Schmid, Laura
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2017, 35 : 26 - 36
  • [27] Gender Discrimination in Exam Grading? Double Evidence from a Natural Experiment and a Field Experiment
    Rangvid, Beatrice Schindler
    B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2019, 19 (02):
  • [28] Discrimination against students with foreign backgrounds: evidence from grading in Swedish public high schools
    Hinnerich, Bjorn Tyrefors
    Hoglin, Erik
    Johannesson, Magnus
    EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2015, 23 (06) : 660 - 676
  • [29] Discrimination towards Youth in Goods and Services Markets: Evidence from Field Experiments in France
    Gray, David M.
    L'Horty, Yannick
    Mbaye, Souleymane
    Petit, Pascale
    YOUTH, 2022, 2 (04): : 772 - 791
  • [30] In your face: a comparative field experiment on racial discrimination in Europe
    Polavieja, Javier G.
    Lancee, Bram
    Ramos, Maria
    Veit, Susanne
    Yemane, Ruta
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 21 (03) : 1551 - 1578