The construction dust-induced occupational health risk using Monte-Carlo simulation

被引:118
作者
Tong, Ruipeng [1 ]
Cheng, Mengzhao [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Liu, Meng [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoyi [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [2 ]
Yin, Wentao [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Municipal Inst Labor Protect, Beijing 100054, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Construction dust; Health risk assessment; Monte-carlo simulation; Uncertainty analysis; ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT MODEL; CYCLE ASSESSMENT; EXPOSURE; POLLUTION; DISEASE; AIR; IMPACTS; WORKERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.286
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A probabilistic risk assessment model was developed to explore the health effects of construction dust on the practitioners in the construction industry based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) risk assessment model and the Monte-Carlo simulation method. The health risk was assessed for workers in five zones during the superstructure construction stage of residential projects in Beijing. Health impairment assessment models were applied to translate health risks into disability adjusted life years (DALYs), which are more intuitive and easy to understand. Sensitivity analysis methods were used to analyse the various exposure parameters and influencing factors that affect the health risk assessment results. The results indicated that workers in the template zone were exposed to the largest health risk, which followed a lognormal distribution of 1.14 x 10(-6) +/- 9.43 x 10(-7), and the probability exceeding 10(-6) was more than 40%. The average health risks for workers in the steel, concrete and floor zones were slightly below 10(-6), and the workers in the office zone had the lowest health risk. The spearman rank correlation coefficient method and the full factorial designs method were used for a sensitivity analysis and validation. Sensitivity analysis showed that the sensitivities of the average exposure time (AT), exposure duration (ED), exposure frequency (EF) and concentration (C) were larger, while AT and body weight (BW) exhibited a negative sensitivity. Workers in the template and steel zones had the larger health damage, with an average of more than 0.1a. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 608
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Multimedia health risk assessment: A case study of scenario-uncertainty [J].
Li Fei ;
Huang Jin-hui ;
Zeng Guang-ming ;
Yuan Xing-zhong ;
Liang Jie ;
Wang Xiao-yu .
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2012, 19 (10) :2901-2909
[22]   Health impacts of construction noise on workers: A quantitative assessment model based on exposure measurement [J].
Li, Xiaodong ;
Song, Ziyang ;
Wang, Tao ;
Zheng, Yu ;
Ning, Xin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 135 :721-731
[23]  
[李小冬 Li Xiaodong], 2015, [清华大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of Tsinghua University. Science and Technology], V55, P50
[24]  
Ministry of Health, 2007, 212007 GBZ MIN HLTH
[25]  
MURRAY CJL, 1994, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V72, P429
[26]  
National bureau of statistics of the People's Republic of China edit, 2011, CHIN STAT YB
[27]   A review of probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land [J].
Öberg, T ;
Bergbäck, B .
JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2005, 5 (04) :213-224
[28]   Cancer risk assessment on trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids in drinking water of China using disability-adjusted life years [J].
Pan, Shenling ;
An, Wei ;
Li, Hongyan ;
Su, Ming ;
Zhang, Jinliang ;
Yang, Min .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2014, 280 :288-294
[29]   Regional probabilistic risk assessment of heavy metals in different environmental media and land uses: An urbanization-affected drinking water supply area [J].
Peng, Chi ;
Cai, Yimin ;
Wang, Tieyu ;
Xiao, Rongbo ;
Chen, Weiping .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[30]   Derivation of US EPA's oral Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury [J].
Rice, G ;
Swartout, J ;
Mahaffey, K ;
Schoeny, R .
DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 23 (01) :41-54