Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Radiology: Trends in Funding and Methodology

被引:13
作者
Lee, Christoph I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jarvik, Jeffrey G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Cost & Outcomes Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Patient-centered outcomes research; pragmatic trials; comparative effectiveness research; RESEARCH-INSTITUTE; PRAGMATIC TRIALS; MIXED METHODS; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.027
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The creation of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 presents new opportunities for funding patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (CER) in radiology. We provide an overview of the evolution of federal funding and priorities for CER with a focus on radiology-related priority topics over the last two decades, and discuss the funding processes and methodological standards outlined by PCORI. We introduce key paradigm shifts in research methodology that will be required on the part of radiology health services researchers to obtain competitive federal grant funding in patient-centered outcomes research. These paradigm shifts include direct engagement of patients and other stakeholders at every stage of the research process, from initial conception to dissemination of results. We will also discuss the increasing use of mixed methods and novel trial designs. One of these trial designs, the pragmatic trial, has the potential to be readily applied to evaluating the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging procedures and imaging-based interventions among diverse patient populations in real-world settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1161
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Albright K, 2013, ACAD PEDIATR, V13, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.acap.2013.06.010
  • [2] [Anonymous], FED COORD COUNC COMP
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, IN NAT PRIOR COMP EF, DOI DOI 10.17226/12648
  • [4] Patient-Centered Outcomes in Imaging: Quantifying Value
    Carlos, Ruth C.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Swan, J. Shannon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (10) : 725 - 728
  • [5] Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages in comparative effectiveness trials: an example in status epilepticus
    Connor, Jason T.
    Elm, Jordan J.
    Broglio, Kristine R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (08) : S130 - S137
  • [6] Comparative-Effectiveness Research - Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report
    Conway, Patrick H.
    Clancy, Carolyn
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (04) : 328 - 330
  • [7] From comparative effectiveness research to patient-centered outcomes research: policy history and future directions
    D'Arcy, Laura P.
    Rich, Eugene C.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (01)
  • [8] Quality-of-Life Assessment of Fibroid Treatment Options and Outcomes
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Kong, Chung Yin
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Swan, J. Shannon
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (03) : 785 - 792
  • [9] Methodological issues in pragmatic trials of complex interventions in primary care
    Foster, Nadine
    Little, Paul
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (594) : 10 - 11
  • [10] Getting the Methods Right - The Foundation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Gabriel, Sherine E.
    Normand, Sharon-Lise T.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (09) : 787 - 790