Unsteady Performance of Rotating Detonation Engines with Different Exhaust Nozzles

被引:71
作者
Braun, James [1 ]
Saracoglu, Bayindir H. [2 ]
Paniagua, Guillermo [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Zucrow Labs, 500 Allison Rd, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Karman Inst Fluid Dynam, Aeronaut & Aerosp Dept, B-1640 Rhode St Genese, Belgium
[3] Purdue Univ, Mech Engn, Zucrow Labs, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
HYDROGEN; WAVE;
D O I
10.2514/1.B36164
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, OpenFoam, an open source unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes software was carefully examined to analyze rotating detonation combustors. This tool was subsequently used to quantify the effect of the outlet conditions on five different exhaust nozzle geometries. Both detonation and deflagration of the hydrogen-air mixture were taken into account in the source terms of the species transport equation. The premixed H-2-air mixture was injected at three different total pressures, ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 MPa. First, the rotating detonation combustor was described, and then five different nozzles were investigated: straight duct, conical, Bezier outer wall, Bezier inner wall, and two Bezier surfaces. All the nozzles were compared regarding their outlet total temperature, pressure gain, exitMachnumber, and outlet flow angle. The use of a straight duct nozzle generated a noticeable drop in pressure gain of about27% compared to the baseline combustor. The conical nozzle expanded the combustor outlet flow from sonic conditions into Mach 1.8 to 2.3. The Bezier outer wall underperformed compared to the conical nozzle at low combustor inlet pressures, while the situation was reversed at higher combustor inlet pressures. Using the inner wall as a divergent section showed no benefits in terms of Mach number and total pressure. The use of a nozzle with two Bezier surfaces did not provide any significant benefits in spite of the enhanced outlet-to-combustor-inlet-area ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 130
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Numerical investigation of the physics of rotating-detonation-engines [J].
Schwer, Douglas ;
Kailasanath, Kailas .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2011, 33 :2195-2202
[22]   Continuous Detonation Engine and Effects of Different Types of Nozzle on Its Propulsion Performance [J].
Shao Yetao ;
Liu Meng ;
Wang Jianping .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2010, 23 (06) :647-652
[23]   Entropy Minimization Design Approach of Supersonic Internal Passages [J].
Sousa, Jorge ;
Paniagua, Guillermo .
ENTROPY, 2015, 17 (08) :5593-5610
[24]  
Theuerkauf SW., 53 AIAA AEROSP SCI M, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2015-1603
[25]  
Toro E. F., 1994, Shock Waves, V4, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF01414629
[26]  
Toro E. F., 2009, Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics, P315, DOI [DOI 10.1007/B7976-1_10, DOI 10.1007/B79761_10, 10.1007/b7976-110]
[27]   Detailed structure of spinning detonation in a circular tube [J].
Tsuboi, N. ;
Eto, K. ;
Hayashi, A. K. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2007, 149 (1-2) :144-161
[28]  
Voitsehovskii B V, 1959, REPORTS USSR ACAD SC, V6, P1254
[29]   A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques [J].
Weller, HG ;
Tabor, G ;
Jasak, H ;
Fureby, C .
COMPUTERS IN PHYSICS, 1998, 12 (06) :620-631
[30]  
Wilhite J., 2016, 54 AIAA AEROSPACE SC