Recall of descriptive information: The roles of presentation format, annotation strategy, and individual differences

被引:19
作者
Moreland, JL
Dansereau, DF
Chmielewski, TL
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth
关键词
D O I
10.1006/ceps.1997.0950
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The benefits of using a comprehensive annotation strategy (employing underlining/circling, making connections, asking questions, and making comments) with knowledge maps (spatial/verbal arrays) and traditional, linear text to improve free recall scores for learners with individual differences in vocabulary and comprehension ability were examined. Types and frequencies of annotations generated were also examined for each stimulus format condition. Multiple regression analyses indicate that the frequency of use of two component annotation strategies, asking questions and making connections, were significant predictors of recall scores, while frequency of underlining/circling and generating elaborations failed to predict recall scores. Text users generated more underlining/circling, while knowledge map users generated more connections between ideas, suggesting that knowledge maps may facilitate the application of more productive annotation strategies. Also examined were the interrelationships between vocabulary ability, comprehension ability, and free recall scores. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 533
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   WHAT IS LEARNED IN NOTE TAKING [J].
BARNETT, JE ;
DIVESTA, FJ ;
ROGOZINSKI, JT .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 73 (02) :181-192
[2]   GENERATION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT HEADINGS [J].
BROOKS, LW ;
DANSEREAU, DF ;
HOLLEY, CD ;
SPURLIN, JE .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 8 (02) :103-108
[3]   THE ROLE OF 5 INDUCED-LEARNING STRATEGIES IN SCIENTIFIC TEXT COMPREHENSION [J].
CASTANEDA, S ;
LOPEZ, M ;
ROMERO, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1987, 55 (03) :125-130
[4]  
Chmielewski T. L., 1997, 87 MIDW PSYCH ASS CO
[5]  
CIOFFI G, 1986, READ RES INSTRUCT, V25, P220
[6]   EFFECTS OF CONVERSATIONAL NOISE, LOCUS OF CONTROL, AND FIELD-DEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ACADEMIC TASKS [J].
COLLINSEILAND, K ;
DANSEREAU, DF ;
BROOKS, LW ;
HOLLEY, CD .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 11 (02) :139-149
[7]   EFFECTS OF QUESTION-GENERATION TRAINING ON READING-COMPREHENSION [J].
DAVEY, B ;
MCBRIDE, S .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 78 (04) :256-262
[8]  
Deignan G. M., 1973, DELTA READING VOCABU
[9]  
FASS W, 1978, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V70, P803
[10]   STUDENT STUDY TECHNIQUES AND THE GENERATION EFFECT [J].
FOOS, PW ;
MORA, JJ ;
TKACZ, S .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 86 (04) :567-576