The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s

被引:115
作者
Curtis, A. [1 ,2 ]
Ross, H. [3 ]
Marshall, G. R. [4 ]
Baldwin, C. [5 ]
Cavaye, J. [3 ]
Freeman, C. [6 ]
Carr, A. [7 ]
Syme, G. J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Inst Land Water & Soc, Albury, NSW, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New England, Inst Rural Futures, Sch Behav Cognit & Social Sci, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sunshine Coast, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sippy Downs, Qld 4556, Australia
[6] Univ Otago, Dept Geog, Dunedin, New Zealand
[7] Australian Bur Agr & Resource Econ & Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[8] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Planning, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
natural resource management; Landcare; catchment management; community-based NRM; participation; INTEGRATED CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; LANDCARE; RESILIENCE; ADAPTABILITY; CONSERVATION; PARTNERSHIPS; AGENCIES; POLICY; RIVER;
D O I
10.1080/14486563.2014.935747
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the 1980s, natural resource management (NRM) in Australia and New Zealand has been an ambitious experiment with community engagement. Underpinned by theory about public participation, adult education and agricultural extension, but also influenced by neoliberalism's calls for 'smaller government', governments embraced engagement as a cost-effective approach to effecting change. Critiques of community engagement are often misguided as they are frequently based on inauthentic or poor engagement practices. Moreover, these critiques have often failed to grasp the nature of the problems being addressed, acknowledge the contributions of engagement or understand the importance of building adaptive capacity to respond to an increasingly complex and uncertain future. The foundations for this commissioned article emerged at a workshop where we reflected and deliberated on our experience as NRM researchers and practitioners over the past 20 years. We begin by identifying the key theories underpinning community engagement and community-based NRM (CBNRM). We then reflect on the experience with community engagement in NRM over the past 20 years and identify key lessons for practitioners and policy makers. Drawing on these insights, and the developing theory around new governance and resilience thinking, we identify opportunities for community engagement under a range of possible futures.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 199
页数:25
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] ABARE, 2003, NAT RES MAN AUSTR FA
  • [2] *AGR FISH FOR AUST, 1999, MAN NAT RES RUR AUST
  • [3] Victorian catchment management approaches to salinity: learning from the National Action Plan experience
    Alexander, J. K.
    Roberts, A. M.
    Pannell, D. J.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 17 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [4] Nipped in the bud: Why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming
    Allan, C
    Curtis, A
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 36 (03) : 414 - 425
  • [5] Allan C, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P425
  • [6] [Anonymous], CBNRM VICTORIA CONTR
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2008, ACHIEVING NRM OUTCOM
  • [8] [Anonymous], GROUNDWATER MANAGEME
  • [9] Aslin H., 2004, WHOLE COMMUNITY ENGA
  • [10] *AUSTR NAT AUD OFF, 2008, 21200708 AUSTR NAT A