Numerical simulation and parametric analysis of multi-anchor walls using the finite element method

被引:7
作者
Siemens, Greg A. [1 ]
Bathurst, Richard J. [1 ]
Miyata, Yoshihisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Mil Coll Canada, Dept Civil Engn, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
[2] Natl Def Acad, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1-10-20 Hashirimizu, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2398686, Japan
关键词
Multi-anchor walls; Numerical modeling; Finite element method; Anchor loads; Reinforced soil walls; REINFORCED SOIL WALLS; SEGMENTAL WALLS; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; JAPAN; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.04.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The paper describes the first reported attempt to numerically simulate the performance of full-scale steel multi-anchor reinforced soil walls (MAWs) during construction using a commercially available two-dimensional finite element method (FEM) model. The numerical simulation results are compared to the measurements taken from three 6 m-high MAW structures that were constructed under carefully controlled in-door laboratory conditions. The walls were nominally identical but constructed with three different sandy soils varying with respect to soil stiffness and shear strength. Earth pressures and anchor loads were monitored during construction and in-situ anchor pullout tests were also performed. Numerical predictions are judged to be in reasonable agreement with most physical measurements. A novel technique was the use of in-situ anchor plate pullout test results to back-calculate initial elastic modulus values for the hyperbolic constitutive soil model used in the study. The physical and numerical results are extended by considering a wider range of wall parameters (initial soil stiffness, shear strength, anchor length and wall height) using the same FEM model. The results of this parametric analysis provide further insight into the influence of the magnitude of different input parameters including wall height on wall performance. The main objective of this study was to generate a satisfactory definition of end-of-construction conditions. The paper also reports the results of a series of case studies that can be used by design engineers to benchmark-test FEM models proposed for MAW projects that are too complicated for analysis and design using conventional simple strength-based internal stability methods and where performance-based design requires estimates of wall deformations. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 69
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Allen TM, 2013, P GEOC SAN DIEG CAL, P2
  • [2] Performance of an 11 m high block-faced geogrid wall designed using the K-stiffness method
    Allen, Tony M.
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [3] Stability of multi-anchor soil walls after loss of toe support
    Bathurst, R. J.
    Miyata, Y.
    Konami, T.
    Miyatake, H.
    [J]. GEOTECHNIQUE, 2015, 65 (11): : 945 - 951
  • [4] Bathurst R.J., 1990, TRANSPORT RES REC, P102
  • [5] Numerical Analysis of an Instrumented Steel-Reinforced Soil Wall
    Damians, I. P.
    Bathurst, R. J.
    Josa, A.
    Lloret, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2015, 15 (01)
  • [6] Vertical-Facing Loads in Steel-Reinforced Soil Walls
    Damians, I. P.
    Bathurst, R. J.
    Josa, A.
    Lloret, A.
    Albuquerque, P. J. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (09) : 1419 - 1432
  • [7] Duncan J.M., 1970, J SOIL MECH FDN ENG, V96, P1629, DOI [10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001458, DOI 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001458]
  • [8] Futaki M, 2001, LANDMARKS IN EARTH REINFORCEMENT, VOL 1, P351
  • [9] Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions
    Hatami, K
    Bathurst, RJ
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (04) : 1066 - 1085
  • [10] Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading
    Hatami, Kianoosh
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (06) : 673 - 684