Diversification of gas sources to improve security of supply using an integrated Multiple Criteria Decision Making approach

被引:5
作者
Devaraj, Devasanthini [1 ,2 ]
Syron, Eoin [1 ,2 ]
Donnellan, Philip [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Chem & Bioproc Engn, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Energy Inst, Dublin, Ireland
来源
CLEANER AND RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION | 2021年 / 3卷
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Gas supply; Diversification; Reliability; Multiple criteria decision making; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100042
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A robust and resilient gas network is crucial for ensuring supply security and economic growth, which can be achieved by having a diverse, cost-efficient, and sustainable gas supply. This study highlights the importance of natural gas and natural gas networks in a low-carbon future and examines the drivers of gas supply diversification. A comprehensive review of various potential gas sources based on cost, availability, quality, and sustainability is performed. An integrated Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach is developed to identify the best alternative gas source for diversifying the gas supply. The implementation of the integrated MCDM approach is demonstrated using 2 case studies: Ireland and Portugal, both countries having significant dependencies on gas imports to supply their gas demand. Developing biomethane production is identified as the most suitable option for diversification in Ireland, followed by floating LNG. Expanding permanent gas storage capacity is identified as the most suitable diversification option for Portugal, followed by the completion of the on-going pipeline interconnector project.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Amelang S., 2020, ENERGY POST BEST THI
[2]   Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods [J].
Amiri, Morteza Pakdin .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (09) :6218-6224
[3]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[4]  
Bird L., 2016, WIND SOLAR ENERGY CU
[5]   The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation in Turkey Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Boran, F. E. ;
Boran, K. ;
Menlik, T. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2012, 7 (01) :81-90
[6]  
Cabrita I., 2015, PORTUGAL EVALUATING
[7]  
Catak E., 2016, NATURAL GAS DIVERSIF
[8]  
Ceic Portugal, 2020, NATURAL GAS CONSUMPT
[9]  
CIEP, 2016, PROSP SUST DIV EUS G
[10]  
DEVaraj D., 2019, INT J ENERGY PROD MA, V4, P53, DOI [10.2495/EQ-V4-N1-53-62, DOI 10.2495/EQ-V4-N1-53-62]