Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation

被引:106
|
作者
Slagt, C. [1 ]
Malagon, I. [2 ]
Groeneveld, A. B. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Zaans Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, NL-1502 DV Zaandam, Netherlands
[2] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Dept Cardiac Anaesthesia, Manchester M20 8LR, Lancs, England
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Intens Care, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
comparing cardiac output; haemodynamic optimization; stroke volume variations; uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis; PULSE CONTOUR ANALYSIS; PREDICT FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; MAJOR ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; RISK SURGICAL-PATIENTS; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; THERMODILUTION TECHNIQUE; MONITORING-SYSTEM; BLOOD-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aet429
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The FloTrac/Vigileo, introduced in 2005, uses arterial pressure waveform analysis to calculate cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation (SVV) without external calibration. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the performance of the system. Sixty-five full manuscripts on validation of CO measurements in humans, published in English, were retrieved; these included 2234 patients and 44 592 observations. Results have been analysed according to underlying patient conditions, that is, general critical illness and surgery as normodynamic conditions, cardiac and (post)cardiac surgery as hypodynamic conditions, and liver surgery and sepsis as hyperdynamic conditions, and subsequently released software versions. Eight studies compared SVV with other dynamic indices. CO, bias, precision, error, correlation, and concordance differed among underlying conditions, subsequent software versions, and their interactions, suggesting increasing accuracy and precision, particularly in hypo- and normodynamic conditions. The bias and the trending capacity remain dependent on (changes in) vascular tone with most recent software. The SVV only moderately agreed with other dynamic indices, although it was helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in 85 of studies addressing this. Since its introduction, the performance of uncalibrated FloTrac/Vigileo has improved particularly in hypo- and normodynamic conditions. A error at or below 30 with most recent software allows sufficiently accurate and precise CO measurements and trending for routine clinical use in normo- and hypodynamic conditions, in the absence of large changes in vascular tone. The SVV may usefully supplement these measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 637
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients
    van Drumpt, A.
    van Bommel, J.
    Hoeks, S.
    Grune, F.
    Wolvetang, T.
    Bekkers, J.
    ter Horst, M.
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [22] New monitors of intravascular volume: A comparison of arterial pressure waveform analysis and the intrathoracic blood volume
    Preisman, S
    Pfeiffer, U
    Lieberman, N
    Perel, A
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (06) : 651 - 657
  • [23] The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: An observational study
    Kang, Woon-Seok
    Kim, Seong-Hyop
    Kim, Sung Yun
    Oh, Chung-Sik
    Lee, Song-Am
    Kim, Jun-Seok
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 148 (06) : 3139 - 3145
  • [24] New monitors of intravascular volume: a comparison of arterial pressure waveform analysis and the intrathoracic blood volume
    S. Preisman
    U. Pfeiffer
    N. Lieberman
    A. Perel
    Intensive Care Medicine, 1997, 23 : 651 - 657
  • [25] Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis Accurately Detects Cardiac Output in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Comparison with Thermodilution, Echocardiography, and Magnetic Resonance Techniques
    Senay, Sahin
    Toraman, Fevzi
    Gelmez, Serkan
    Dagdelen, Sinan
    Karabulut, Hasan
    Alhan, Cem
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2009, 12 (02) : E75 - E78
  • [26] Assessment of a cardiac output device using arterial pulse waveform analysis, Vigileo™, in cardiac surgery compared to pulmonary arterial thermodilution
    Hamm, J. -B.
    Nguyen, B. -V.
    Kiss, G.
    Wargnier, J. -P.
    Jauffroy, A.
    Helaine, L.
    Arvieux, C. C.
    Gueret, G.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [27] Reliability of stroke volume or pulse pressure variation as dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review
    Chen, Jiaxin
    Zhao, Shuhua
    Zhu, Qianqian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2023, 37 (02) : 379 - 387
  • [28] Cardiac output monitoring in intensive care patients by radial artery pressure waveform analysis
    Mukkamala, R
    Kuiper, J
    Ahmad, S
    Lu, Z
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2004, 26 : 3712 - 3715
  • [29] Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy
    Metzelder, S.
    Coburn, M.
    Fries, M.
    Reinges, M.
    Reich, S.
    Rossaint, R.
    Marx, G.
    Rex, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (06) : 776 - 784
  • [30] Continuous noninvasive pulse wave analysis using finger cuff technologies for arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Saugel, Bernd
    Hoppe, Phillip
    Nicklas, Julia Y.
    Kouz, Karim
    Koerner, Annmarie
    Hempell, Julia C.
    Vos, Jaap J.
    Schoen, Gerhard
    Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (01) : 25 - 37