Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation

被引:106
|
作者
Slagt, C. [1 ]
Malagon, I. [2 ]
Groeneveld, A. B. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Zaans Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, NL-1502 DV Zaandam, Netherlands
[2] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Dept Cardiac Anaesthesia, Manchester M20 8LR, Lancs, England
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Intens Care, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
comparing cardiac output; haemodynamic optimization; stroke volume variations; uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis; PULSE CONTOUR ANALYSIS; PREDICT FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; MAJOR ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; RISK SURGICAL-PATIENTS; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; THERMODILUTION TECHNIQUE; MONITORING-SYSTEM; BLOOD-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aet429
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The FloTrac/Vigileo, introduced in 2005, uses arterial pressure waveform analysis to calculate cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation (SVV) without external calibration. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the performance of the system. Sixty-five full manuscripts on validation of CO measurements in humans, published in English, were retrieved; these included 2234 patients and 44 592 observations. Results have been analysed according to underlying patient conditions, that is, general critical illness and surgery as normodynamic conditions, cardiac and (post)cardiac surgery as hypodynamic conditions, and liver surgery and sepsis as hyperdynamic conditions, and subsequently released software versions. Eight studies compared SVV with other dynamic indices. CO, bias, precision, error, correlation, and concordance differed among underlying conditions, subsequent software versions, and their interactions, suggesting increasing accuracy and precision, particularly in hypo- and normodynamic conditions. The bias and the trending capacity remain dependent on (changes in) vascular tone with most recent software. The SVV only moderately agreed with other dynamic indices, although it was helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in 85 of studies addressing this. Since its introduction, the performance of uncalibrated FloTrac/Vigileo has improved particularly in hypo- and normodynamic conditions. A error at or below 30 with most recent software allows sufficiently accurate and precise CO measurements and trending for routine clinical use in normo- and hypodynamic conditions, in the absence of large changes in vascular tone. The SVV may usefully supplement these measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 637
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncalibrated Radial and Femoral Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis for Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement: An Evaluation in Cardiac Surgery Patients
    Hofer, Christoph K.
    Button, Danny
    Weibel, Luc
    Genoni, Michele
    Zollinger, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2010, 24 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [2] Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements
    Michael Sander
    Claudia D Spies
    Herko Grubitzsch
    Achim Foer
    Marcus Müller
    Christian von Heymann
    Critical Care, 10
  • [3] Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform
    Mayer, Jochen
    Suttner, Stefan
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 22 (06) : 804 - 808
  • [4] Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveform-Based Cardiac Output Using the FloTrac/Vigileo: A Review and Meta-analysis
    Mayer, Jochen
    Boldt, Joachim
    Poland, Reagan
    Peterson, Amanda
    Manecke, Gerard R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2009, 23 (03) : 401 - 406
  • [5] Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots
    Sawa, Teiji
    Kinoshita, Mao
    Kainuma, Atsushi
    Akiyama, Koichi
    Naito, Yoshifumi
    Kato, Hideya
    Amaya, Fumimasa
    Shigemi, Keiji
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2017, 31 (05) : 927 - 941
  • [6] The Vigileo-FloTrac™ System: Arterial Waveform Analysis for Measuring Cardiac Output and Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Clinical Review
    Suehiro, Koichi
    Tanaka, Katsuaki
    Matsuura, Tadashi
    Funao, Tomoharu
    Yamada, Tokuhiro
    Mori, Takashi
    Nishikawa, Kiyonobu
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (05) : 1361 - 1374
  • [7] Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices
    Monnet, Xavier
    Anguel, Nadia
    Naudin, Brice
    Jabot, Julien
    Richard, Christian
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (03):
  • [8] Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock
    Slagt, Cornelis
    de Leeuw, Marcel A.
    Beute, Jan
    Rijnsburger, Emmy
    Hoeksema, Martijn
    Mulder, Jan W. R.
    Malagon, Ignacio
    Groeneveld, A. B. Johan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2013, 27 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [9] RETRACTED: Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for less-invasive cardiac output determination in obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery (Retracted Article)
    Mayer, J.
    Boldt, J.
    Beschmann, R.
    Stephan, A.
    Suttner, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (02) : 185 - 190
  • [10] Cardiac Output Measurement by Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis During Optimization of Biventricular Pacing After Cardiac Surgery
    Booth, Justin H.
    Quinn, T. Alexander
    Richmond, Marc E.
    Cabreriza, Santos E.
    Weinberg, Alan D.
    Johnston, Taylor
    Spotnitz, Henry M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2009, 55 (06) : 587 - 591