Secondary school teachers' preferences in the process of individual technology mentoring

被引:5
作者
Top, Ercan [1 ]
Baser, Derya [1 ]
Akkus, Recai [2 ]
Akayoglu, Sedat [3 ]
Gurer, Melih Derya [1 ]
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Comp Educ & Instruct Technol Dept, Fac Educ, TR-14030 Bolu, Turkey
[2] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Math & Sci Educ Dept, Fac Educ, TR-14030 Bolu, Turkey
[3] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Foreign Language Educ Dept, Fac Educ, TR-14030 Bolu, Turkey
关键词
Teacher professional development; Secondary education; Information literacy; Pedagogical issues; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; PRESERVICE TEACHERS; INTEGRATE TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATION; ICT; PERCEPTIONS; BELIEFS; IMPACT; INFORMATION; CLASSROOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104030
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Technology mentoring helps to overcome various barriers to ICT integration in education and increases teachers' use of ICT for personal and professional purposes. Technology mentoring could make this improvement possible by providing a flexible environment for teachers in their educational settings. For this reason, one-to-one teacher-mentor matching was designed, and the details of the process were led by the teachers' preferences. In this study, which lasted for two semesters, 54 mentors and 48 teachers were paired based on the mentors' decision whether they preferred to work with language teachers or Mathematics teachers. As for the data of the study, the mentors' weekly logs and their responses to the question on the way of content determination were collected. Analyzing the responses of the mentors, it was seen that teachers were more dominant in the content decision process. Moreover, the analysis of the mentors' weekly logs revealed that teachers asked for help with learning software programs, designing instructional materials, workload support, and technical support, from the most frequently demanded to least one, respectively. Teachers' demands related to program learning constitute almost three-fourths of the total demands. When the teacher was given enough flexibility in their context, it was seen that a teacher-centered process of ICT integration emerged. The study concluded that teachers put forward their knowledge of ICT in solving problems if they had the opportunity to try their ideas. Therefore, it is suggested that teachers should be actively involved in the decision-making process of ICT training content.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Global Digital Citizenship: Providing Context [J].
Armfield, Shadow W. J. ;
Blocher, J. Michael .
TECHTRENDS, 2019, 63 (04) :470-476
[2]   Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre-service teachers' integration of ICT into teaching practices [J].
Aslan, Aydin ;
Zhu, Chang .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 48 (02) :552-570
[3]   What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample [J].
Baek, Youngkyun ;
Jung, Jaeyeob ;
Kim, Bokyeong .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 50 (01) :224-234
[4]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
[5]   Teachers' achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers' help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation [J].
Butler, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 99 (02) :241-252
[6]  
Cetin N.I., 2016, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, V11, P8026
[7]   Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning [J].
Chun, Dorothy ;
Smith, Bryan ;
Kern, Richard .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2016, 100 :64-80
[8]   Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures [J].
Desimone, Laura M. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (03) :181-199
[9]   Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers [J].
Dincer, Serkan .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 23 (06) :2699-2718
[10]  
Erdem A., 2019, J ED TRAIN STUD, V7, P50, DOI [10.11114/jets.v7i7.3943, DOI 10.11114/JETS.V7I7.3943]