The dynamic nature of marketing constructs

被引:52
作者
Bergkvist, Lars [1 ]
Eisend, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zayed Univ, POB 144534, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] European Univ Viadrina, Grosse Scharrnstr 59, D-15230 Frankfurt, Oder, Germany
关键词
Marketing research; Knowledge accumulation; Definition; Operationalization; Market orientation; Brand equity; Involvement; Need for cognition; C-OAR-SE; BRAND EQUITY; ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITIES; STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS; INNOVATION; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-020-00756-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study proposes an ideal, four-stage model of construct evolution (emergence -> conceptualization -> competition -> consensus) to explain construct development over time. An in-depth analysis of conceptualizations of two constructs, market orientation (MO) and customer-based brand equity (CBBE), however, reveals different evolutionary stages and trajectories that deviate from the ideal model. The final stage for MO and CBBE is fragmentation, not consensus, characterized by customized operationalizations and variable construct definitions. A supplementary analysis of need for cognition (NFC) and involvement constructs provides additional support. For example, the final stage of NFC is dominance, characterized by nearly complete reliance on standard definitions and operationalizations. Conceptual research, formal measure development, and differing types of constructs all can influence the evolution of constructs. These findings have deep implications for marketing research: Diverse definitions and operationalizations can impede knowledge accumulation. This article proposes guidelines for improving research practices and managing constructs across evolutionary stages.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 541
页数:21
相关论文
共 133 条
[31]   Have We Progressed Marketing Knowledge? A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Marketing Research [J].
Eisend, Martin .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2015, 79 (03) :23-40
[32]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550
[33]   Market orientation and performance: A meta-analysis and cross-national comparisons [J].
Ellis, Paul D. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (05) :1089-1107
[34]  
Escalas JenniferE., 1998, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V7, P131, DOI [10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02, DOI 10.1207/S15327663JCP070202]
[35]   A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology [J].
Fabrigar, Leandre R. ;
Wegener, Duane T. ;
Petty, Richard E. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 24 (04) :316-344
[36]   What Counts Versus What Can Be Counted: The Complex Interplay of Market Orientation and Marketing Performance Measurement [J].
Frosen, Johanna ;
Luoma, Jukka ;
Jaakkola, Matti ;
Tikkanen, Henrikki ;
Aspara, Jaakko .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2016, 80 (03) :60-78
[37]   Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal [J].
Gangestad, SW ;
Snyder, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2000, 126 (04) :530-555
[38]   Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation [J].
Gebhardt, Gary F. ;
Carpenter, Gregory S. ;
Sherry, John F., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2006, 70 (04) :37-55
[39]   A new measure of brand personality [J].
Geuens, Maggie ;
Weijters, Bert ;
De Wulf, Kristof .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2009, 26 (02) :97-107
[40]   Measuring Processing Fluency: One versus Five Items [J].
Graf, Laura K. M. ;
Mayer, Stefan ;
Landwehr, Jan R. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) :393-411