Objects influence the shape of remembered views: Examining global and local aspects of boundary extension

被引:3
作者
Dickinson, Christopher A. [1 ]
LaCombe, Daniel C., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Psychol, Boone, NC 28608 USA
关键词
boundary extension; false memory; scene perception; VERTICAL-HORIZONTAL ILLUSION; ORIENTATION-DEPENDENCE; SCENE REPRESENTATION; MEMORY; RECOGNITION; LAYOUT; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; PICTURES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1068/p7631
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Boundary extension is a constructive memory error for Views of scenes in which views tend to,be remembered as more spatially expansive than they appeared. In seven experiments we examined whether local differences in boundary extension within views might exist by presenting participants with overhead views of single, elongated objects or object pairs on textured ground surfaces in which objects were oriented either vertically or horizontally. Memory for views' spatial expanse was tested with either a view-recognition test or a border-adjustment test in which participants could adjust the spatial expanse of a test view using the computer's mouse. The border-adjustment test was used to assess local boundary extension (primarily); the view-recognition test was used to assess participants' memories for the overall spatial expanse of views (ie global boundary extension). Across experiments, in the border-adjustment tests specifically, participants showed more spatial expanse along the object's longer axis, in some cases restricting the view along the object's shorter axis. In addition, the recognition-test data revealed greater boundary extension for views with vertically oriented objects than for views with horizontally oriented objects. Taken together, the results suggest that objects in scene views can affect both local and global aspects of memory for spatial expanse of scene views.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 753
页数:23
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Visual objects in context [J].
Bar, M .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 5 (08) :617-629
[2]   Boundary extension: The role of magnification, object size, context, and binocular information [J].
Bertamini, M ;
Jones, LA ;
Spooner, A ;
Hecht, H .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2005, 31 (06) :1288-1307
[3]   Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size [J].
Carrasco, M ;
Talgar, CP ;
Cameron, EL .
SPATIAL VISION, 2001, 15 (01) :61-75
[4]   Extrapolating spatial layout in scene representations [J].
Castelhano, Monica S. ;
Pollatsek, Alexander .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (08) :1018-1025
[5]   The vertical-horizontal illusion in hemi-spatial neglect [J].
de Montalembert, M. ;
Mamassian, P. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (11) :3245-3251
[6]   Transsaccadic representation of layout: What is the time course of boundary extension? [J].
Dickinson, Christopher A. ;
Intraub, Helene .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2008, 34 (03) :543-555
[7]   Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: Consequences of an attentional bias? [J].
Dickinson, Christopher A. ;
Intraub, Helene .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2009, 71 (06) :1251-1262
[8]   ORIENTATION DEPENDENCE IN THE RECOGNITION OF FAMILIAR AND NOVEL VIEWS OF 3-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS [J].
EDELMAN, S ;
BULTHOFF, HH .
VISION RESEARCH, 1992, 32 (12) :2385-2400
[9]   Fixating picture boundaries does not eliminate boundary extension: Implications for scene representation [J].
Gagnier, Kristin Michod ;
Dickinson, Christopher A. ;
Intraub, Helene .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) :2161-2186
[10]   Why does vantage point affect boundary extension? [J].
Gagnier, Kristin Michod ;
Intraub, Helene ;
Oliva, Aude ;
Wolfe, Jeremy M. .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2011, 19 (02) :234-257