Does Increased Free Flap Size in the Head and Neck Region Impact Clinical Outcome?

被引:5
作者
Myers, Larry L. [1 ]
Ahn, Chul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
RECONSTRUCTION; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; MICROSURGERY; DEFECTS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: There are few studies analyzing the long-term clinical effects related to increasing the size of head and neck free tissue reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing very large area (>= 200 cm(2)) and large area (100 to 199 cm(2)) free tissue reconstructions of head and neck defects. Patients and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained before conducting this retrospective cohort study at the authors' university-based tertiary care hospitals. The authors analyzed the charts of consecutive patients with free flaps of at least 100 cm(2) treated from July 2000 to December 2011. Very large area flaps were arbitrarily defined as larger than 200 cm(2). Intraoperative variables, flap success rates, overall survival, and total hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays for the 2 groups were analyzed. Fisher exact tests or chi(2) tests were used for categorical variables and Student t tests were used for continuous variables. Log-rank tests were conducted to investigate whether overall survival was significantly different between the 2 groups. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than .05. Results: The charts of 121 consecutive patients were analyzed. Thirty-eight patients (31%) had very large area flaps (277.1 +/- 79.4 cm(2); range, 200 to 576 cm(2)) and 83 patients (69%) had large area flaps (140.1 +/- 25.5 cm(2)). There was no difference between flap groups in presenting T4 stage disease (P = .448). Ninety-eight percent of the very large area flaps and 93% of the large area flaps survived. Total hospital stays for the very large area and large area flap groups were 12.8 +/- 8.2 and 12.3 +/- 8.3 days, respectively (P = not significant). In contrast, ICU stays were increased for the very large area flap group at 7.1 +/- 7.5 versus 4.0 +/- 4.0 days for the large area flap group (P = .022). The overall median patient survival for the very large area flap group was 7.6 months (95% confidence interval, 5.7-10.0) and that for the large area flap group was 8.4 months (95% confidence interval, 5.4-12.9; P = .376). Conclusion: Performing very large area flaps for head and neck reconstruction did not negatively affect clinical outcome. Comparable success rates, total hospital stays, and overall survival can be safely achieved in this difficult patient population. More studies need to be conducted on resource usage. (C) 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1832 / 1840
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Reconstruction Scalp Defects After Malignant Tumor Resection With Anterolateral Thigh Flaps [J].
Bi Bo ;
Yang Qun ;
Pu Zheming ;
Xiao Haitao ;
Liu Tianyi .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 22 (06) :2208-2211
[2]   The free anterolateral thigh musculocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction: One surgeon's experience in 92 cases [J].
Bianchi, Bernardo ;
Ferri, Andrea ;
Ferrari, Silvano ;
Copelli, Chiara ;
Boni, Pietro ;
Ferri, Teore ;
Sesenna, Enrico .
MICROSURGERY, 2012, 32 (02) :87-95
[3]   Free radial forearm flap versus pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects:: a cost analysis [J].
de Bree, R. ;
Reith, R. ;
Quak, J. J. ;
Uyl-de, Groot C. A. ;
van Agthoven, M. ;
Leemans, C. R. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 32 (04) :275-282
[4]   Economic factors affecting head and neck reconstructive microsurgery: The surgeons' and hospital's perspective [J].
Deleyiannis, Frederic W. -B. ;
Porter, Andrew C. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (01) :157-165
[5]   MICROSURGERY FOR MACRODEFECTS - MICROVASCULAR FREE-TISSUE TRANSFER FOR MASSIVE DEFECTS OF THE HEAD AND NECK [J].
HARDESTY, RA ;
JONES, NF ;
SWARTZ, WM ;
RAMASASTRY, SS ;
HECKLER, FD ;
NEWTON, ED ;
SCHRAMM, VL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 154 (04) :399-405
[6]   Predictors of complications of free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery: Analysis of 304 free flap reconstruction procedures [J].
le Nobel, Gavin J. ;
Higgins, Kevin M. ;
Enepekides, Danny J. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (05) :1014-1019
[7]   What Makes a Good Flap Go Bad?: A Critical Analysis of the Literature of Intraoperative Factors Related to Free Flap Failure [J].
Pattani, Kavita M. ;
Byrne, Patrick ;
Boahene, Kofi ;
Richmon, Jeremy .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2010, 120 (04) :717-723
[8]   The influence of reconstructive modality on cost of care in head and neck oncologic surgery [J].
Petruzzelli, GJ ;
Brockenbrough, JM ;
Vandevender, D ;
Creech, SD .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2002, 128 (12) :1377-1380
[9]   Microvascular free flaps in head and neck surgery: complications and outcome of 1000 flaps [J].
Pohlenz, P. ;
Klatt, J. ;
Schoen, G. ;
Blessmann, M. ;
Li, L. ;
Schmelzle, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (06) :739-743
[10]   SINGLE FREE ANTEROLATERAL THIGH FLAP FOR SIMULTANEOUS RECONSTRUCTION OF COMPOSITE HYPOPHARYNGEAL AND EXTERNAL NECK SKIN DEFECT AFTER HEAD AND NECK CANCER ABLATION [J].
Tan, Ngian Chye ;
Yeh, Ming-Chung ;
Shih, Hsiang-Shun ;
Nebres, Rico P. ;
Yang, Johnson Chia-Shen ;
Kuo, Yur-Ren .
MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (07) :524-528