Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class

被引:131
作者
Strand, Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, Oxford, England
关键词
ethnicity; equity; gender; achievement; social class; intersectionality; EDUCATIONAL-ACHIEVEMENT; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; STRATIFICATION; ATTAINMENT; ENGLAND; SCHOOLS; WALES;
D O I
10.1080/02671522.2013.767370
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Perhaps the most prevailing inequalities in educational achievement in England are those associated with socio-economic status (SES), ethnicity and gender. However, little research has sought to compare the relative size of these gaps or to explore interactions between these factors. This paper analyses the educational achievement at age 11, 14 and 16 of over 15,000 students from the nationally representative longitudinal study of young people in England. At age 16, the achievement gap associated with social class was twice as large as the biggest ethnic gap and six times as large as the gender gap. However, the results indicate that ethnicity, gender and SES do not combine in a simple additive fashion; rather, there are substantial interactions particularly between ethnicity and SES and between ethnicity and gender. At age 16 among low SES students, all ethnic minority groups achieve significantly better than White British students (except Black Caribbean boys who do not differ from White British boys), but at high SES only Indian students outperform White British students. A similar pattern of results was apparent in terms of progress age 11-16, with White British low SES students and Black Caribbean boys (particularly the more able) making the least progress. Parents' educational aspirations for their child and students' own educational aspirations, academic self-concept, frequency of completing homework, truancy and exclusion could account for the minority ethnic advantage at low SES, but conditioning on such factors simultaneously indicates substantial ethnic underachievement at average and high SES. Accounts of educational achievement framed exclusively in terms of social class, ethnicity or gender are insufficient, and the results challenge educational researchers to develop more nuanced accounts of educational success or failure.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 171
页数:41
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RACISM ED COINCIDENC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators
[3]  
[Anonymous], RACE SOC
[4]   GENDER-ROLES AND SCHOOL SUBJECTS IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS [J].
ARCHER, J ;
MCDONALD, M .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 33 (01) :55-64
[5]  
Archer L., 2007, UNDERSTANDING MINORI
[6]   The 1991 International Assessment of Educational Progress in Mathematics and Sciences: The gender differences perspective [J].
Beller, M ;
Gafni, N .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (02) :365-377
[7]  
Boudon R., 1974, Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society
[8]   Equality and opportunity in education: evidence from the 1958 and 1970 birth cohort studies [J].
Bynner, J ;
Joshi, H .
OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2002, 28 (04) :405-425
[9]   Racial differences in the effects of significant others on students' educational expectations [J].
Cheng, S ;
Starks, B .
SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2002, 75 (04) :306-327
[10]  
Coleman S., 1966, Equality of Educational Opportunity