The discontinuation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: Impact upon patient adverse events and hospital operations

被引:15
|
作者
Schrank, Gregory M. [1 ]
Snyder, Graham M. [2 ]
Davis, Roger B. [3 ]
Branch-Elliman, Westyn [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wright, Sharon B. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Infect Prevent & Control, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Infect Dis Sect, Dept Med, West Roxbury, MA USA
[5] VA Boston Ctr Healthcare Org & Implementat Res, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Silverman Inst Hlth Care Qual & Safety, Div Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[8] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
contact precautions; methicillin-resistantstaphylococcus aureus; vancomycin-resistantenterococcus; PREVENTING TRANSMISSION; CARE; MRSA; COST; TIME; VRE; ASSOCIATION; ELIMINATION; ORGANISMS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008926
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) are a resource-intensive intervention to reduce healthcare-associated infections, potentially impeding patient throughput and limiting bed availability to isolate other contagious pathogens. We investigated the impact of the discontinuation of contact precautions (DcCP) for endemic MRSA and VRE on patient outcomes and operations metrics in an acute care setting. Methods This is a retrospective, quasi-experimental analysis of the 12 months before and after DcCP for MRSA and VRE at an academic medical centre. The frequency for bed closures due to contact isolation was measured, and personal protective equipment (PPE) expenditures and patient satisfaction survey results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Using an interrupted time series design, emergency department (ED) admission wait times and rates of patient falls, pressure ulcers and nosocomial MRSA and VRE clinical isolates were compared using GEEs. Results Prior to DcCP, bed closures for MRSA and/or VRE isolation were associated with estimated lost hospital charges of $9383 per 100 bed days (95%CI: 8447 to 10 318). No change in ED wait times or change in trend was observed following DcCP. There were significant reductions in monthly expenditures on gowns (-61.0%) and gloves (-16.3%). Patient satisfaction survey results remained stable. No significant changes in rates or trends were observed for patient falls or pressure ulcers. Incidence rates of nosocomial MRSA (1.58 (95% CI: 0.82 to 3.04)) and VRE (1.02 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.27)) did not significantly change. Conclusions DcCP was associated with an increase in bed availability and revenue recovery, and a reduction in PPE expenditures. Benefits for other hospital operations metrics and patient outcomes were not identified.
引用
收藏
页码:834 / 843
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Brown, Jennifer
    CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS, 2014, 2 (04): : 189 - 195
  • [22] A Hidden Reservoir of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in Patients Newly Admitted to an Acute Rehabilitation Hospital
    Rabinowitz, Ronald P.
    Kufera, Joseph A.
    Makley, Michael J.
    PM&R, 2012, 4 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [23] Environmental Panels as a Proxy for Nursing Facility Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Colonization
    Cassone, Marco
    Mantey, Julia
    Perri, Mary Beth
    Gibson, Kristen
    Lansing, Bonnie
    McNamara, Sara
    Patel, Payal K.
    Cheng, Vincent C. C.
    Walters, Maroya S.
    Stone, Nimalie D.
    Zervos, Marcus J.
    Mody, Lona
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 (06) : 861 - 868
  • [24] A Discrete Event Simulation Model of Patient Flow in a General Hospital Incorporating Infection Control Policy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE)
    Shenoy, Erica S.
    Lee, Hang
    Ryan, Erin E.
    Hou, Taige
    Walensky, Rochelle P.
    Ware, Winston
    Hooper, David C.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2018, 38 (02) : 246 - 261
  • [25] Survival of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus spp. for an Extended Period of Transport
    Robinson, Gwen L.
    Harris, Anthony D.
    Morgan, Daniel J.
    Pineles, Lisa
    Belton, Beverly M.
    Johnson, J. Kristie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (07) : 2466 - 2468
  • [26] In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium
    Kilic, A
    Baysallar, M
    Besirbellioglu, B
    Salih, B
    Sorkun, K
    Tanyuksel, M
    ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (02) : 113 - 117
  • [27] Chlorhexidine-based body washing for colonization and infection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: an updated meta-analysis
    Xiao, Guibao
    Chen, Zhu
    Lv, Xiaoju
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2018, 11 : 1473 - 1481
  • [28] Long-term impact of contact precautions cessation for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
    AlMohanna, Zainab
    Snavely, Anna C.
    Viviano, James P.
    Bischoff, Werner E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2022, 50 (03) : 336 - 341
  • [29] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Jennifer Brown
    Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2014, 2 (4) : 189 - 195
  • [30] Contact precautions for Clostridium difficile and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Prieto, Jacqui
    Clark, Jill Macleod
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2005, 10 (05) : 511 - 526