The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare

被引:66
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
broiler production system; animal welfare; consumer perception; conjoint analysis; individual difference; GROWING PIGS; PREFERENCES; POULTRY; FOOD; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS; ELEMENTS; FARMERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2013-03334
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This research explores the extent to which different farm management practices influence the perceived animal friendliness of broiler production systems, and how this differs between individuals. Using a conjoint design with paired comparisons, respondents evaluated broiler production systems that were described on the basis of 7 animal welfare-related practices. It was found that practices in the area of outdoor access, stocking density, and day-night rhythm were overall perceived to have a larger impact on perceptions of animal friendliness than other practices, such as transport duration or the type of breed used. However, individuals differed regarding the extent to which they believed the different farm management practices influenced the animal friendliness of the production system. Differences between individuals regarding their knowledge about and familiarity with livestock farming, degree of anthropomorphism, and their moral beliefs regarding animal welfare partly explained the relative importance individuals attached to farm management practices. The obtained insight into which welfare-related farm management practices, in consumers' minds, most strongly contribute to animal welfare, and the existence of differences between consumers, can be helpful in the development of animal welfare-based certification schemes that are appealing to consumers, as well as the positioning of welfare concepts in the market.
引用
收藏
页码:3080 / 3095
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Animal welfare at slaughter: perceptions and knowledge across cultures [J].
Sinclair, Michelle ;
Hotzel, Maria Jose ;
Lee, Natasha Y. P. ;
de Luna, Maria Catalina T. ;
Sharma, Arvind ;
Idris, Musadiq ;
Islam, Mohammad Ariful ;
Iyasere, Oluwaseun S. ;
Navarro, Grisel ;
Ahmed, Abdelkareem A. ;
Burns, Georgette Leah ;
Curry, Michael ;
Marchant, Jeremy N. .
FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4
[42]   Modern Technologies for Improving Broiler Production and Welfare: A Review [J].
Brasso, Lili D. ;
Komlosi, Istvan ;
Varszegi, Zsofia .
ANIMALS, 2025, 15 (04)
[43]   Application of the Welfare Quality® animal welfare assessment system in Finnish pig production, part II: Associations between animal-based and environmental measures of welfare [J].
Munsterhjelm, C. ;
Heinonen, M. ;
Valros, A. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2015, 24 (02) :161-172
[44]   Reducing the Consumer Attitude-Behaviour Gap in Animal Welfare: The Potential Role of "Nudges' [J].
Vigors, Belinda .
ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (12)
[45]   Animal Welfare Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Stockpersons in Kenya [J].
Wambui, Joseph ;
Lamuka, Peter ;
Karuri, Edward ;
Matofari, Joseph .
ANTHROZOOS, 2018, 31 (04) :397-410
[46]   Impact of the factors of animal production and welfare on robotic milking frequency [J].
Cordova, Helder de Arruda ;
Moro Alessio, Dileta Regina ;
Cardozo, Leonardo Leite ;
Thaler Neto, Andre .
PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 53 (02) :238-246
[47]   Animal Welfare Assessment in Antibiotic-Free and Conventional Broiler Chicken [J].
Iannetti, Luigi ;
Romagnoli, Sara ;
Cotturone, Giuseppe ;
Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri .
ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (10)
[48]   Bridging consumer perception and on-farm assessment of animal welfare [J].
Napolitano, F. ;
De Rosa, G. ;
Caporale, G. ;
Carlucci, A. ;
Grasso, F. ;
Monteleone, E. .
ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) :249-253
[49]   Consumer trust in animal farming practices - exploring the high trust of Finnish consumers [J].
Jokinen, Pekka ;
Kupsala, Saara ;
Vinnari, Markus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2012, 36 (01) :106-113
[50]   Consumer attitudes and perceptions towards sustainable animal production attributes in Mexico City [J].
Santurtun Oliveros, Eduardo ;
Tapia Perez, Graciela ;
Gonzalez-Rebeles, Carlos ;
Galindo Maldonado, Francisco .
VETERINARIA MEXICO, 2012, 43 (02) :87-101