The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare

被引:64
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
broiler production system; animal welfare; consumer perception; conjoint analysis; individual difference; GROWING PIGS; PREFERENCES; POULTRY; FOOD; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS; ELEMENTS; FARMERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2013-03334
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This research explores the extent to which different farm management practices influence the perceived animal friendliness of broiler production systems, and how this differs between individuals. Using a conjoint design with paired comparisons, respondents evaluated broiler production systems that were described on the basis of 7 animal welfare-related practices. It was found that practices in the area of outdoor access, stocking density, and day-night rhythm were overall perceived to have a larger impact on perceptions of animal friendliness than other practices, such as transport duration or the type of breed used. However, individuals differed regarding the extent to which they believed the different farm management practices influenced the animal friendliness of the production system. Differences between individuals regarding their knowledge about and familiarity with livestock farming, degree of anthropomorphism, and their moral beliefs regarding animal welfare partly explained the relative importance individuals attached to farm management practices. The obtained insight into which welfare-related farm management practices, in consumers' minds, most strongly contribute to animal welfare, and the existence of differences between consumers, can be helpful in the development of animal welfare-based certification schemes that are appealing to consumers, as well as the positioning of welfare concepts in the market.
引用
收藏
页码:3080 / 3095
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of animal welfare on worldwide poultry production
    Bessei, W.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2018, 74 (02) : 211 - 224
  • [22] Consumer trust and willingness to pay for establishing a market-based animal welfare assurance scheme for broiler chickens
    Heinola, Katriina
    Latvala, Terhi
    Niemi, Jarkko K.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2023, 102 (07)
  • [23] Measuring consumer perceptions over beef good practices and sustainable production process
    Burnier, Pedro Carvalho
    Guerra, Diego de Sousa
    Spers, Eduardo Eugenio
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2021, 123 (04): : 1362 - 1383
  • [24] Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden
    Algers, B
    Berg, C
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 88 - 92
  • [25] Consumer Perceptions of Dairy Welfare and Production: A Role for Vets in Public Education?
    Ellis, K. A.
    Billington, K.
    McNeil, B.
    McKeegan, D. E. F.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2009, 17 : 148 - 152
  • [26] How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda, Yuta
    Oishi, Kazato
    Chomei, Yosuke
    Hirooka, Hiroyuki
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 146 : 75 - 86
  • [27] Consumer perception of animal welfare and livestock production in the Araucania Region, Chile
    Schnettler M., Berta
    Vidal M., Ricardo
    Silva F., Roberto
    Vallejos C., Lisette
    Sepulveda B., Nestor
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 68 (01): : 80 - 93
  • [28] Impact of water sanitation on broiler chicken production and welfare parameters
    Jacobs, L.
    Persia, M. E.
    Siman-Tov, N.
    McCoy, J.
    Ahmad, M.
    Lyman, J.
    Good, L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (01) : 258 - 268
  • [29] Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare
    Alonso, Marta E.
    Gonzalez-Montana, Jose R.
    Lomillos, Juan M.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [30] Application of the Welfare Quality® animal welfare assessment system in Finnish pig production, part I: Identification of principal components
    Munsterhjelm, C.
    Heinonen, M.
    Valros, A.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2015, 24 (02) : 151 - 160