The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare

被引:66
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
broiler production system; animal welfare; consumer perception; conjoint analysis; individual difference; GROWING PIGS; PREFERENCES; POULTRY; FOOD; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES; CITIZENS; ELEMENTS; FARMERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2013-03334
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This research explores the extent to which different farm management practices influence the perceived animal friendliness of broiler production systems, and how this differs between individuals. Using a conjoint design with paired comparisons, respondents evaluated broiler production systems that were described on the basis of 7 animal welfare-related practices. It was found that practices in the area of outdoor access, stocking density, and day-night rhythm were overall perceived to have a larger impact on perceptions of animal friendliness than other practices, such as transport duration or the type of breed used. However, individuals differed regarding the extent to which they believed the different farm management practices influenced the animal friendliness of the production system. Differences between individuals regarding their knowledge about and familiarity with livestock farming, degree of anthropomorphism, and their moral beliefs regarding animal welfare partly explained the relative importance individuals attached to farm management practices. The obtained insight into which welfare-related farm management practices, in consumers' minds, most strongly contribute to animal welfare, and the existence of differences between consumers, can be helpful in the development of animal welfare-based certification schemes that are appealing to consumers, as well as the positioning of welfare concepts in the market.
引用
收藏
页码:3080 / 3095
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SPEC EUR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, VET REC, V131, P357
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1965, REPORT TECHNICAL COM
[5]   Do what consumers say matter? the misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions [J].
Auger, Pat ;
Devinney, Timothy M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 76 (04) :361-383
[6]  
Barnard C. J., 1996, Animal Welfare, V5, P405
[7]   Effects of a 16-hour light, 8-hour dark lighting schedule on behavioral traits and performance in male broiler chickens [J].
Bayram, A. ;
Ozkan, S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (03) :263-273
[8]   Ambivalence towards meat [J].
Berndsen, M ;
van der Pligt, J .
APPETITE, 2004, 42 (01) :71-78
[9]  
Bessei W, 2006, WORLD POULTRY SCI J, V62, P455, DOI [10.1017/S0043933906001085, 10.1079/WPS2005108]
[10]   The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal well-being [J].
Blokhuis, H. J. ;
Veissier, I. ;
Miele, M. ;
Jones, B. .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 60 (03) :129-140