Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment

被引:57
作者
Drummond, Michael [1 ]
Towse, Adrian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
关键词
Rare diseases; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Drug reimbursement; Health technology assessment; CHALLENGES; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-014-0560-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Current orphan drug policies are unsatisfactory when viewed from almost all perspectives. Patients find that, although therapies are available for many rare conditions, access to care is sometimes restricted. Pharmaceutical manufacturers have responded to the incentives for research embodied in orphan drug legislation, only to find that funds are not made available to pay for therapies once developed. Those funding health care find that most orphan drugs do not justify funding based on standard value for money criteria, yet that they face political problems if they fail to provide funding for therapy. A literature review was conducted in order to determine the precise nature of the problems and to suggest potential solutions. Current orphan drug policies are not fit for the purpose and initiatives need to be taken in the areas of (1) clarifying society's views about the priority to be given to orphan drugs, (2) revising the arrangements for pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs, (3) defining the priorities for research into rare diseases and (4) developing 'joined up' policies to deal with these issues. Without changes in the current policies, pharmaceutical companies will eventually cease responding to the incentives to develop orphan drugs, because they will increasingly be uncertain whether the drugs, if developed, will be reimbursed.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, The R&D cost of a new medicine
  • [2] [Anonymous], HLTH PARTNERSHIPS RE
  • [3] The Health Impact Fund: incentives for improving access to medicines
    Banerjee, Amitava
    Hollis, Aidan
    Pogge, Thomas
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9709) : 166 - 169
  • [4] Advance market commitments for vaccines against neglected diseases:: Estimating costs and effectiveness
    Berndt, Ernst R.
    Glennerster, Rachel
    Kremer, Michael R.
    Lee, Jean
    Levine, Ruth
    Weizsacker, Georg
    Williams, Heidi
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (05) : 491 - 511
  • [5] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [6] Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy
    Clarke, JTR
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 174 (02) : 189 - 190
  • [7] What Is Wrong with Orphan Drug Policies?
    Cote, Andre
    Keating, Bernard
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (08) : 1185 - 1191
  • [8] NEED - THE IDEA WONT DO - BUT WE STILL NEED IT
    CULYER, AJ
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 40 (06) : 727 - 730
  • [9] Daniels NormanJames E. Sabin., 2002, SETTING LIMITS FAIRL
  • [10] Department of Health (UK), 2011, NEW VAL BAS APPR PRI