Pain Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft

被引:32
作者
Okoroha, Kelechi R. [1 ]
Keller, Robert A. [1 ]
Jung, Edward K. [1 ]
Khalil, Lafi [2 ,3 ]
Marshall, Nathan [1 ]
Kolowich, Patricia A. [1 ]
Moutzouros, Vasilios [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2799 West Grand Blvd CFP 6, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; pain control; knee arthroscopy; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; bone-patellar tendon-bone; hamstring tendon; autograft; POSTDISCHARGE SYMPTOMS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK; DETERMINANTS; REVISION; REGISTRY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1177/2325967116674924
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common outpatient procedure that is accompanied by significant postoperative pain. Purpose: To determine differences in acute pain levels between patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) versus hamstring tendon (HS) autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 70 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using either BTB or HS autografts consented to participate. The primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain levels (visual analog scale), which were collected immediately after surgery and for 3 days postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included opioid consumption (intravenous morphine equivalents), hours slept, patient satisfaction, reported breakthrough pain, and calls to the physician. Results: Patients treated with BTB had increased pain when compared with those treated with HS in the acute postoperative period (mean +/- SD: day 0, 6.0 +/- 1.7 vs 5.2 +/- 2.0 [P = .066]; day 1, 5.9 +/- 1.7 vs 4.9 +/- 1.7 [P = .024]; day 2, 5.2 +/- 1.9 vs 4.1 +/- 2.0 [P = .032]; day 3, 4.8 +/- 2.1 vs 3.9 +/- 2.3 [P = .151]). There were also significant increases in reported breakthrough pain (day 0, 76% vs 43% [P = .009]; day 1, 64% vs 35% [P = .003]) and calls to the physician due to pain (day 1, 19% vs 0% [P = .041]) in the BTB group. There were no significant differences in narcotic requirements or sleep disturbances. Overall, the BTB group reported significantly less satisfaction with pain management on days 0 and 1 (P = .024 and .027, respectively). Conclusion: A significant increase in acute postoperative pain was found when performing ACL reconstruction with BTB compared with HS. Patients treated with BTB were more likely to have breakthrough pain, decreased satisfaction with their pain management, and to contact their physician due to pain. These findings suggest a difference in early postoperative pain between the 2 most common graft options for ACL reconstruction. Patients should be informed of the differences in acute postoperative pain when deciding on graft choice with their physician.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Reconstructing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament A Meta-Analysis Based on Individual Patient Data [J].
Biau, David Jean ;
Katsahian, Sandrine ;
Kartus, Juri ;
Harilainen, Arsi ;
Feller, Julian A. ;
Sajovic, Matjaz ;
Ejerhed, Lars ;
Zaffagnini, Stefano ;
Roepke, Martin ;
Nizard, Remy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (12) :2470-2478
[2]   Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States [J].
Buller, Leonard T. ;
Best, Matthew J. ;
Baraga, Michael G. ;
Kaplan, Lee D. .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (01) :1-8
[3]   Lower Risk of Revision With Patellar Tendon Autografts Compared With Hamstring Autografts A Registry Study Based on 45,998 Primary ACL Reconstructions in Scandinavia [J].
Gifstad, Tone ;
Foss, Olav A. ;
Engebretsen, Lars ;
Lind, Martin ;
Forssblad, Magnus ;
Albrektsen, Grethe ;
Drogset, Jon Olav .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10) :2319-2328
[4]   Short-term recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective comparison of three autografts [J].
Joseph, M ;
Fulkerson, J ;
Nissen, C ;
Sheehan, J .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 29 (03) :243-248
[5]   Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts [J].
Kartus, J ;
Movin, T ;
Karlsson, J .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2001, 17 (09) :971-980
[6]  
Katabi M, 2002, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V88, P139
[7]   Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Kocher, MS ;
Steadman, R ;
Briggs, K ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Sterett, WI ;
Hawkins, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (09) :1560-1572
[8]   Postoperative discomfort after outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective comparative study [J].
Lefevre, N. ;
Klouche, S. ;
de Pamphilis, O. ;
Devaux, C. ;
Herman, S. ;
Bohu, Y. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (02) :163-166
[9]   A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament [J].
Li, Shuzhen ;
Chen, Yueping ;
Lin, Zonghan ;
Cui, Wei ;
Zhao, Jingmin ;
Su, Wei .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) :1287-1297
[10]   Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts [J].
Ma, Yong ;
Murawski, Christopher D. ;
Rahnemai-Azar, Amir Ata ;
Maldjian, Catherine ;
Lynch, Andrew D. ;
Fu, Freddie H. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (03) :661-668