Comparative Studies of Power Grid Security with Network Connectivity and Power Flow Information Using Unsupervised Learning

被引:0
作者
Poudel, Shiva [1 ]
Ni, Zhen [1 ]
Zhong, Xiangnan [2 ]
He, Haibo [2 ]
机构
[1] South Dakota State Univ, Elect Engn & Comp Sci Dept, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Elect Comp & Biomed Engn, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
来源
2016 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN) | 2016年
关键词
power grid security; cascading failures; computational intelligence; unsupervised learning; self-organizing map (SOM); K-means algorithm; VULNERABILITY; FAILURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The modern electric power grid has become highly integrated in order to increase reliability of power transmission from the generating units to end consumers. This integrated nature and its upgrade toward an intelligent smart grid make the power grid vulnerable when facing cyber or physical attacks as well as intentional attacks. Therefore, determining the most vulnerable components (e.g., buses or generators) is critically important for power grid defense. In this paper, a new definition of load is proposed by taking power flow into consideration in comparison with the load definition based on degree or network connectivity. Unsupervised learning techniques (e.g., K-means algorithm and self-organizing map (SOM)) are introduced to cluster the nodes (i.e., buses) in IEEE-39 bus and IEEE-57 bus benchmarks. Then most vulnerable node in each cluster is determined based on their load information to form initial victim set. We use percentage of failure (PoF) to compare the performance of clustering based approach and traditional load based approach during cascading failure process. With the simulation results, the unsupervised learning (clustering based) approaches are more efficient in finding the most vulnerable nodes and our proposed definition of load is relatively useful in studying power grid security.
引用
收藏
页码:2730 / 2737
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid [J].
Albert, R ;
Albert, I ;
Nakarado, GL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 69 (02) :025103-1
[2]  
[Anonymous], The Smart Grid: An Introduction
[3]   Structural vulnerability of power systems: A topological approach [J].
Bompard, Ettore ;
Wu, Di ;
Xue, Fei .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (07) :1334-1340
[4]  
Boudour M, 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE-ISIE 2004, Vols 1 and 2, P1321
[5]   Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J].
Crucitti, P ;
Latora, V ;
Marchiori, M ;
Rapisarda, A .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2004, 340 (1-3) :388-394
[6]   Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization [J].
Dobson, Ian ;
Carreras, Benjamin A. ;
Lynch, Vickie E. ;
Newman, David E. .
CHAOS, 2007, 17 (02)
[7]  
Golovko VA, 2007, IEEE IJCNN, P2733
[8]  
I. T. Institute, 2013, ILLINOIS CTR SMARTER
[9]   Topological analysis in bulk power system reliability evaluation [J].
Jonnavithula, S ;
Billinton, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1997, 12 (01) :456-461
[10]  
Khaitan S., 2006, System topology based identification of high risk nk contingencies