Intra-uterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility

被引:8
作者
Cantineau, Astrid E. P. [1 ]
Cohlen, Ben J. [2 ]
Heineman, Maas Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-9713 MA Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Isala Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 02期
关键词
CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION; UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY RATES; CATHETER TYPE; SYSTEM; TRIAL; FSP; IUI;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) combined with intrauterine insemination (IUI) is commonly offered to couples with subfertility that does not involve the fallopian tubes. Another method is fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP). This technique ensures the presence of higher sperm densities in the fallopian tubes at the time of ovulation than does standard IUI. The aim of this review was to determine whether FSP and IUI differ in improving the probability of conception. Objectives To investigate whether pregnancy and live birth outcomes differ between fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of non-tubal subfertility. Search strategy We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (October 2008), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2008), and EMBASE (January 1988 to October 2008). Abstracts of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1987 to 2008) and European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (1987 to 2008) meetings were searched using the same key or text words. Selection criteria Only truly randomised controlled studies comparing FSP with IUI were included in this review. Couples with non-tubal subfertility who have been trying to conceive for at least one year were included. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently selected the trials for inclusion based on the quality of the studies. Main results Eight studies involving 595 couples were included in the meta-analysis. Only one study reported the live birth rate and there was no evidence of a difference between FSP and IUI (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.5). There was no evidence of a difference between FSP and IUI for clinical pregnancy per couple (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.7). A subgroup analysis which included couples with unexplained subfertility only (n = 239) did not report any difference between FSP and IUI (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.89to2.8). Authors' conclusions For non-tubal subfertility, the results indicate no clear benefit for FSP over IUI. Therefore the advice offered to subfertile couples regarding the comparative use of FSP versus IUI in the treatment of non-tubal subfertility should reflect this.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] ALDERSON P, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [2] ALLAHBADIA GN, 1998, FERTIL STERIL, V70, pS438
  • [3] Arroyo Vieyra O, 1995, GINECOL OBSTET MEX, V63, P514
  • [4] PUBLICATION BIAS AND DISSEMINATION OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
    BEGG, CB
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (02) : 107 - 115
  • [5] Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial
    Biacchiardi, CP
    Revelli, A
    Gennarelli, G
    Rustichelli, S
    Moffa, F
    Massobrio, M
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (02) : 448 - 451
  • [6] Boomsma CM, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD005996.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD005996]
  • [7] Breslow NE, 1980, STAT METHODS CANC RE, P122
  • [8] Ovarian reserve testing and the use of prognostic models in patients with subfertility
    Bukman, A
    Heineman, MJ
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2001, 7 (06) : 581 - 590
  • [9] Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility
    Cantineau, A. E. P.
    Cohlen, B. J.
    Heineman, M. J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (02):
  • [10] Chalmers T C, 1989, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V5, P521